Reviews for Update Scanner
Update Scanner by sneakypete81
Rated 4 out of 5
4 Stars out of 5
378 reviews
- by Firefox user 14889077, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14874350, a year agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14784191, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14736144, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14725756, a year agoRated 4 out of 5Me semble Très Intéressant. Vais Donc L'Utiliser
- by Firefox user 14771710, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 12310154, a year agoRated 3 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14719096, a year agoRated 4 out of 5
- by NotCompatible, a year agoRated 1 out of 5You can't monitor parts of a page. There are false alarms because other advertisements have been loaded into the page.
--- --- --- ---
Mann kann keine Teile einer Seite überwachen. So gibt es Fehlalarme, weil andere Werbung in die Seite geladen wurde. - by Firefox user 14684306, a year agoRated 1 out of 5used to be great. not now. new version deleted all my scan pages. no way to recover. no help available. do not use. do not support.
- by Firefox user 14667136, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14612916, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14662783, a year agoRated 3 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14092804, a year agoRated 5 out of 5This is a great add-on. The only thing I would ask is the chance to put the sidebar list in alphabetical order rather than newest added first. If you end up with a lot of sites that you are trying to monitor, you may end up adding the same site twice and not be able to delete the copy. PLEASE!
- by Tim G., a year agoRated 1 out of 5I can't get this to work. Most of the time I click the icon, I get a blank drop down window.
- by WakeUp, a year agoRated 1 out of 5Lack of features. Can't choose a specified item of web-page by DOM. Can't set delay in seconds between web-page checks. Can't specify random delay also. Etc...
- by Firefox user 14550933, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14548242, a year agoRated 4 out of 5That's quite perfect, only missing thing is higher checking frequency.
What about introducing checking frequency up to 5s or at least 30s?
Thanks Pete! - by Mubasher, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14542525, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14530730, a year agoRated 4 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14530110, a year agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14325840, a year agoRated 5 out of 5