Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by Firefox user 18345593
Rated 5 out of 5
by Firefox user 18345593, 4 months ago416 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pablo, a day ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meow, 4 days agoHi, I'm transfemme. "Theyfab" is an anti-trans slur and we should not play into patriarchal transmisia by not treating it as such. I'll change my review if you fix this. I'm friends with many people affected by this slur and it's silly and divisive to not treat it as such. Trans people don't all hate each other because we came from different backgrounds and have different genders- that's just overemphasized internet drama, not real life. I gave all my old masculine clothes to a friend affected by this slur, and I don't feel comfortable not treating it as a slur. A word that bioessentializes someone's AGAB as their gender is absolutely the definition of transphobia and constitutes a slur. This is like basic transfeminism 101.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Crunk, 8 days agomade a guide to say its okay to use a term that misgenders enby people, good job everyone /s
- Rated 1 out of 5by Hee-Ho-Kun, 8 days agoThe moderators have begun marking trans people as transphobic for specific stances on intra-community issues; this extension is now useless because of that.
- Rated 1 out of 5by KozaBerserker, 12 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ray Bluesock, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by lark, 15 days agoI checked the guidelines today and saw they were updated this year (in april) on the github guide to say that "theyfab" is "out of scope" and just "a mean word" even though referring to a trans person's AGAB like this (or at all) is misgendering, even when the person is being bigoted, and should be cut and dry transphobia. (The guidelines even acknowledge enbyphobia making this even more baffling.)
The definition given for the term on the site is more than able to be used with little confusion in discussion without this issue and frankly it's alarming to see the devs suddenly downplay misgendering acceptable targets in the guide for an extension that's supposed to help protect trans people (as this is an extremely common form of transphobia). This doesn't make it feel like a very reliable extension anymore. - Rated 5 out of 5by Zoey Cakes, 25 days agogreat for showing which creators to support and companys <3 fantastic :3 trans rights are human rights
- Rated 5 out of 5by Elizabeth, a month ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Parad0xx333, a month ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by jahtnamas, a month agogetting real tired of seeing blogs marked green with rancid takes like "all trans men should die horribly" so im done with this
- Rated 4 out of 5by MilkToast, a month agoVery cool, all my favourite X users now have a red name cosmetic 🔥
- Rated 1 out of 5by parallax77, a month agounreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.
- Rated 2 out of 5by digicat, a month agoThis used to really be useful, but in the past month or so seemingly random people have been marked as transphobic, while I see green names who have actively harassed trans women I'm close to, and who otherwise don't meet the current requirements for being marked green whatsoever. Not sure what is happening but I am no longer very trusting of the judgements being made.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17022614, a month agoat one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore
- Rated 5 out of 5by Not~ryuu, a month ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by ol, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Charlie Bush, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 18448020, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Erynn, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by crgzero, 2 months agoNot accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Colton, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Clara, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Alex, 2 months ago