Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
57 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by yyupo, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Pablo, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Meow, 2 months agoHi, I'm transfemme. "Theyfab" is an anti-trans slur and we should not play into patriarchal transmisia by not treating it as such. I'll change my review if you fix this. I'm friends with many people affected by this slur and it's silly and divisive to not treat it as such. Trans people don't all hate each other because we came from different backgrounds and have different genders- that's just overemphasized internet drama, not real life. I gave all my old masculine clothes to a friend affected by this slur, and I don't feel comfortable not treating it as a slur. A word that bioessentializes someone's AGAB as their gender is absolutely the definition of transphobia and constitutes a slur. This is like basic transfeminism 101.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Crunk, 2 months agomade a guide to say its okay to use a slur that misgenders enby people, good job everyone /s
- Rated 1 out of 5by Hee-Ho-Kun, 2 months agoThe moderators have begun marking trans people as transphobic for specific stances on intra-community issues; this extension is now useless because of that.
- Rated 1 out of 5by KozaBerserker, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by parallax77, 3 months agounreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17022614, 3 months agoat one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore
- Rated 1 out of 5by ol, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by crgzero, 4 months agoNot accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.
- Rated 1 out of 5by AJ167, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by anettka, 5 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Scoobysnak, 6 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 15176908, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18066063, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by MirioMan, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by herr, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by bleh, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18026876, a year agoit is hardly ever accurate and mainly boils down to things the creators just disagree with
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17366374, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17823267, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Bong13, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Virtuality, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17175745, 2 years ago