FireMonkey 的评价
FireMonkey 作者: erosman
55 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Dodge1,4 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 royalsos,4 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 tuure,7 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Brown121,10 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14571563,10 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 DavidK2,1 年前The UI is much better and more intuitive than that of TemperMonkey.
I really like the distinction between CSS and JS modifications and that I don’t need to use “proprietary” GreaseMonkey functions like GM_addStyle (` /* the CSS goes here */ `).
FireMonkey also doesn’t exhibit the bug that TemperMonkey does — when I navigated the same portal over many pages, it seemed TM kept adding the same CSS script over and over, which, over time, slowed Firefox noticeably (after a while TM reported aplying about 70 scripts instead of 2!). - 评分 5 / 5来自 ImQP,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Frantishek,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ben SALT.id,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 idealth,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Modenium,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Rayke,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 emacsomancer,2 年前It is indeed super lightweight. A nice advantage to being on Firefox, as it's not available elsewhere.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 serotonin_2a,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 tibequadorian,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 MoiceVail,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Ghost,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17385582,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Footmen,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 John Doe,2 年前Since the only userscript managers that worked in Firefox Android (beta & nightly through custom collection) are this and tampermonkey, I choose this becase it's open source and more lightweight. Good job
- 评分 5 / 5来自 kayexalate,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17597008,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Good Developer,2 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 anonymous,3 年前