Tellcheck for GitHub bởi Munzzyy
Flags likely AI-generated pull requests and issues on GitHub. A signal for maintainers, not a verdict.
Siêu dữ liệu mở rộng
Ảnh chụp màn hình
Về tiện ích mở rộng này
Your issue tracker is filling with AI slop. Codeberg, Godot, OpenJDK, Rust, and Ghostty all restricted AI-generated contributions this year. Whichever way a project lands, enforcing it means a human still has to read every submission.
Tellcheck for GitHub does the first read. On any GitHub pull request or issue, click scan. The description and comments get badges saying whether the text statistically reads as AI-generated. Each badge opens a breakdown of the exact signals that fired: buzzword density, stock phrases, uniform sentence rhythm, chat-UI artifacts, and more. On a repo's pull request list, scan up to 25 open PRs in one click. Anything past a scan's limit is labeled "not scored", never silently skipped.
Honest about what it is. It surfaces tells for a human to weigh and never returns a verdict. Nobody can prove AI authorship after the fact, this tool included. Every result is a signal at a stated false-positive rate. On a held-out set of 4,300 real non-native-English essays that rate is 7.8%, not zero. That is the honest ceiling on trusting any single flag. It is why the advice never changes: judge the contribution, not the author. The full measurement page with the held-out numbers and the named failure modes is linked from the site.
Private by design. Nothing leaves your browser until you click scan (auto-scan exists, ships off). Scanned text is scored over HTTPS and discarded, never stored. No accounts, no tracking. Optional GitHub token for batch scans stays on your device.
Tellcheck for GitHub does the first read. On any GitHub pull request or issue, click scan. The description and comments get badges saying whether the text statistically reads as AI-generated. Each badge opens a breakdown of the exact signals that fired: buzzword density, stock phrases, uniform sentence rhythm, chat-UI artifacts, and more. On a repo's pull request list, scan up to 25 open PRs in one click. Anything past a scan's limit is labeled "not scored", never silently skipped.
Honest about what it is. It surfaces tells for a human to weigh and never returns a verdict. Nobody can prove AI authorship after the fact, this tool included. Every result is a signal at a stated false-positive rate. On a held-out set of 4,300 real non-native-English essays that rate is 7.8%, not zero. That is the honest ceiling on trusting any single flag. It is why the advice never changes: judge the contribution, not the author. The full measurement page with the held-out numbers and the named failure modes is linked from the site.
Private by design. Nothing leaves your browser until you click scan (auto-scan exists, ships off). Scanned text is scored over HTTPS and discarded, never stored. No accounts, no tracking. Optional GitHub token for batch scans stays on your device.
Được xếp hạng 0 (bởi 1 người dùng)
Quyền hạn và dữ liệu
Quyền hạn bắt buộc:
- Truy cập dữ liệu của bạn cho github.com
Dữ liệu cần thu thập, theo nhà phát triển:
- Nội dung trang web
Thu thập dữ liệu tùy chọn, theo nhà phát triển:
- Dữ liệu kỹ thuật và tương tác
Thêm thông tin
- Liên kết tiện ích
- Phiên bản
- 0.1.1
- Kích cỡ
- 30,1 KB
- Cập nhật gần nhất
- 14 giờ trước (3 Thg 09 2026)
- Thể loại có liên quan
- Giấy phép
- Giấy phép MIT
- Chính sách riêng tư
- Đọc chính sách riêng tư của tiện ích này
- Lịch sử các phiên bản
- Thêm vào bộ sưu tập