Análises de Suíte de Segurança NoScript
Suíte de Segurança NoScript por Giorgio Maone
Análise de Usuário 13553842 do Firefox
Avaliado em 2 de 5
por Usuário 13553842 do Firefox, há 7 anosGeorgio wrote:
> Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform)
> just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript
BUT maybe it is not so much about recreating the old thing, than understanding what the problem with the new thing is. First you need to accept that the current approach is simply not intuitive. As a dev (I am one myself, so I had this problem myself) its hard to understand when that happens, because for you its as familiar as a part of your body, but it is obviously a mistery for everbody else.
Also, about your "duty": Its true what you said, but: if many people now dont use NoScript at all, because they do not get it anymore, you decreased web security by a lot.
So:
- Simpler is better. Simpler might be less safer, but if the alternative is not using it at all, it's still better. Way better.
- get rid of the slider. It looks mhm good(?), but its not recognizable as one.
- there is way to much clickable stuff, one does not get what is a button, what a link and whatnot...
- make it simpler: hide everything exept: domain name, status icon and -depending on the status- two buttons for each entry.
- clear design, dont change font size and font color at any time
- No xss-popups. In fact, never, ever use popups.
Instead:
- a simple list of domains like before, each with a status icon in front of it: your blue "S", for allowed, same with a little clock for temporarily allowd, red crossed "S" for disallowed
- depending on the current status of an entry, two buttons:
- if currently allowed: "disallow" and "temp. disallow"
- if currently disallowed: "allow" and "temp. allow"
- these buttons need to be different than the status icon. I would use red X and green hook/check, each with and without a little clock.
- dont make anything but the buttons clickable! not the text, not the status icon.
Thats it.
You can add a (clearly seperated from the other buttons, clearly different graphic) button behind each list entry to hide all the detailed settings, for the expert. Everybody else gets the simple list.
At the very buttom of the list go -clearly separated - three entries: "temp allow all" and "save permissions for this site" and "deactivate noscript".
No problem to do that in html. And believe me, people will love you again. :)
If you would like me to make a mockup of what Ive just desrcibed, just say so and tell me where to send it.
And btw.: You dont owe us anything. People have no right being rude to you about something you gave us for free. But maybe see their ill-advised passion as a testament to how important NoScript is to us. That is something I think, even if you must hate the internet right now.
I thank you for the old NoScript and that it helped increase my security. But I won't use the current one. So I would thank you again if you make it simple and easy to use again.
> Unfortunately I cannot do the impossible (recreating legacy NoScript on the new, much more limiting WebExtension platform)
> just because "people" ask for the impossible. And I've the duty to provide the best security NoScript
BUT maybe it is not so much about recreating the old thing, than understanding what the problem with the new thing is. First you need to accept that the current approach is simply not intuitive. As a dev (I am one myself, so I had this problem myself) its hard to understand when that happens, because for you its as familiar as a part of your body, but it is obviously a mistery for everbody else.
Also, about your "duty": Its true what you said, but: if many people now dont use NoScript at all, because they do not get it anymore, you decreased web security by a lot.
So:
- Simpler is better. Simpler might be less safer, but if the alternative is not using it at all, it's still better. Way better.
- get rid of the slider. It looks mhm good(?), but its not recognizable as one.
- there is way to much clickable stuff, one does not get what is a button, what a link and whatnot...
- make it simpler: hide everything exept: domain name, status icon and -depending on the status- two buttons for each entry.
- clear design, dont change font size and font color at any time
- No xss-popups. In fact, never, ever use popups.
Instead:
- a simple list of domains like before, each with a status icon in front of it: your blue "S", for allowed, same with a little clock for temporarily allowd, red crossed "S" for disallowed
- depending on the current status of an entry, two buttons:
- if currently allowed: "disallow" and "temp. disallow"
- if currently disallowed: "allow" and "temp. allow"
- these buttons need to be different than the status icon. I would use red X and green hook/check, each with and without a little clock.
- dont make anything but the buttons clickable! not the text, not the status icon.
Thats it.
You can add a (clearly seperated from the other buttons, clearly different graphic) button behind each list entry to hide all the detailed settings, for the expert. Everybody else gets the simple list.
At the very buttom of the list go -clearly separated - three entries: "temp allow all" and "save permissions for this site" and "deactivate noscript".
No problem to do that in html. And believe me, people will love you again. :)
If you would like me to make a mockup of what Ive just desrcibed, just say so and tell me where to send it.
And btw.: You dont owe us anything. People have no right being rude to you about something you gave us for free. But maybe see their ill-advised passion as a testament to how important NoScript is to us. That is something I think, even if you must hate the internet right now.
I thank you for the old NoScript and that it helped increase my security. But I won't use the current one. So I would thank you again if you make it simple and easy to use again.
2.226 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 14861945 do Firefox, há 19 horas
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Me, há 10 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17935220 do Firefox, há 14 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Daniele, há 16 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 16541872 do Firefox, há 20 diasEnfin, cette extension semble faire disparaître ces fenêtres digiketa intempestives et énervantes !!!
Merci aux concepteurs :) - Avaliado em 5 de 5por PyroMaster, há 22 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18430307 do Firefox, há 22 dias
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Usuário 18300440 do Firefox, há um mêsThis addon is really nice, until recently. For whatever reason, it was completely reset on all my devices, so I am in the process of ADDING back all the custom setting and it is annoying... I almost uninstalled it.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18420765 do Firefox, há um mêsAbsolute necessity: it's the closest a user can get to controlling the execution flow of the browser without intervening at the source level, which would require someone to build the project from source
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por DrWhoFan13, há um mêsA recent change broke a website, and refreshing the extension didn't help.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Paulo Oliveira, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 14731076 do Firefox, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por infirms, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18305813 do Firefox, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17903605 do Firefox, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18349116 do Firefox, há um mês
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Sam, há um mêsI think the user interface could use more work with limited options to change the appearance. It may help that you use a basic or general rule set on file, as you may be setting rules for things that are essential to browsing. You can only do this by importing a text file. This is a great extension for having more control to what is loaded into browsing.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por aa, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 3 de 5por Usuário 13107376 do Firefox, há 2 mesescreo que la extension esta muy verde
deberia bloquear paginas peligrosas no al reves
lo bloquea todo y espera que lo arregles tu
pienso que deberia permitir todo excepto paginas peligrosas - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Guará, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18377949 do Firefox, há 2 meses