合計レビュー数: 4
- 5 段階中 4 の評価Davide によるレビュー (2年前)So it only works for RAW files, not on the pages itself, is that correct?
Thank you :-)開発者の返信
投稿日時: 2年前Yes, that's correct: raw files (with a few exceptions that won't work, those on raw.githubusercontent.com being a notable one).
We could technically inject the library code to colour elements on regular pages, but I wouldn't really know what to colour exactly, it depends too much on the page. Doing all `` blocks could be a thing maybe, or we could imagine adding a feature to selectively colour a block, but there's nothing of the sort supported by the add-on at the moment. - 5 段階中 4 の評価Firefox ユーザー 14068156 によるレビュー (6年前)
- 5 段階中 4 の評価enderandpeter によるレビュー (6年前)I thought it was missing PHP, but it was just not in an obvious place. There's an initial list of what I guess are commonly requested languages and then suddenly it's an alphabetical list. Maybe the whole thing should be alphabetical for such a long list.
開発者の返信
投稿日時: 6年前Thank you for the feedback!
The library that is used by the add-on makes a distinction between a set of “most-common languages”, and all other languages it supports. For technical reasons, this add-on initially supported just this restricted set of languages. When I added all the other ones (including PHP), I appended them to the list. So in fact this makes two alphabetical lists: a first one with the “most-common languages” (as presented by the library, I'm not actually trying to classify languages here), and a second one below, with all other languages.
I understand that this might be confusing. Maybe I will change it in the future. Ideally, I would like to implement an option to switch between the complete list of languages, or just the restricted subset. One advantage would be that auto-detection goes much faster when the library is compiled for fewer languages…
Anyway, thanks again! - 5 段階中 4 の評価Ludwig によるレビュー (6年前)Works. However, the settings could be better. It's hard to find a good, bright color scheme without a quick preview.