Critiques pour Smart Referer
Smart Referer par meh., ntninja
Avis de tama
Noté 5 sur 5
par tama, il y a 3 ansThanks for great addon!
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
Just one issue if you have time.
Somehow exception list doesn't seem working for instagram.com, even I put source "instagram.com" and destination "cdninstagram.com".
Firefox inspector still show faked referrer is sent.
Appreciated if you have time to look in.
Thanks.
76 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Krisna S. Putra, il y a 3 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Lucas S., il y a 2 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14234915 de Firefox, il y a 2 ansPlease update the whitelist
https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions#-optional - Noté 5 sur 5par Bryan Hoang, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par kcufuoyeid, il y a 2 ansIt works for me, for the most part. I saw my firewall logs and somebody else mentioned some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
It's crazy to have such checking for updates every startup at 24 hour internals with no way to change this is a bit excessive. I disabled whitelist. downloaded the whitelist , modified it to my own liking and stored it as a local file. This add-on would be vastly improved it had a easier to use and more intuitive interface for managing websites if they break. Last update was 3 years ago so I guess that's it for this add-on. - Noté 2 sur 5par rocksoccer, il y a 2 ansIt kind of does its job, but as many other reviews mentioned, whitelist is really such a bad idea for most people and most usage scenarios.
I only want to modify the referers for a particular website and that's all. Blacklist will be much better. I know it is not as so-called safe as whitelist, but it will become suitable for much more people. - Noté 5 sur 5par Artyom, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Aa, il y a 3 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Wojox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par odysseus, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Novakof, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par まさきん, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16037335 de Firefox, il y a 4 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Mofiac, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13541847 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14392904 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansIs it really required to use dweb infrastructure to get a tiny whitelist file? My FF shooting a bunch of requests to some shady looking urls:
globalupload.io
gateway.ipfs.io
ipfs.infura.io
gateway.temporal.cloud
gateway.pinata.cloud
cloudflare-ipfs.io
dweb.link
I thought I've got a malware when I saw that in my log files.
And it takes half an hour to figure out the source of suspicious web traffic. - Noté 5 sur 5par Anton, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Сырное, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15254132 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par _ztv, il y a 5 ansРасширение давно не работает, хватит звездочки ему ставить. Да и белый список давно не обновлялся.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13386478 de Firefox, il y a 5 ansDoesn't seem to work. Simple settings in the FF's about:config work, however.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13864526 de Firefox, il y a 5 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par GammaGate, il y a 5 ans