Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
95 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14089294, a month agoNoscript has for me always been a painful experience. But now it is totally out of control in my Win7/Firefox pc. The latest depradation is I can no longer pay important personal monthly bills via the net and have had to resort to sending personal checks via the US mail. And there seems to be no way to fix the problem other than the excruciating learning curve an 85 year old used must face in learning a new operating system. Ed Weldon
- Rated 1 out of 5by phantom, 3 months agoAccess to all of my data?! NO THANKS. not worth giving over my passwords.
Developer response
posted 3 months ago"Access all your data" is the (rightly so) scary wording for the permission to inject code inside the webpages you load, which is used by NoScript to provide selective protections (e.g. disable webgl per-site). Unlike most other software, NoScript does not collect ANY user data (let alone passwords), as clearly stated in its Privacy Policy. Furthermore, it is included by default in the Tor Browser, which would never allow anything like that. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 18038771, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Robert s, 3 months agoIt was OK for years. I trusted FedEx but it will not load now. I am unable to see when a package will be delivered. Saying it is a privileged page and I can't change it. I'm going to uninstsll it. I have to be able to see these pages so nosscipt is now nomore.
Developer response
posted 3 months agoCould you please report on https://noscript.net/forum with more details to reproduce? thanks. - Rated 1 out of 5by pjevanoff, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17921562, 3 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Christian Alain Martel, 4 months agoNoScript is a nice idea on paper but actual use is such an effort that it exceeds its apparent benefit. This app needs a feature so that the community of users can contribute to what features on a web site need to be refused and which are acceptable. For each user to have to go over this mountain of work is rediculous.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17178110, 4 months agoSettings lose after restart if duckduckgo installed.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14676894, 5 months agoIts block all sites. Internet stop work with it
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17917367, 6 months agoalas does not show many scrips but blocks them without choice.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17904436, 7 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13420189, 7 months agoTotally broken since the last update, I switched from release to ESR because I couldn't find the issue why Firefox became unusable after a few hours getting slower and eating up resources like crazy. In ESR I still had the issue that refreshing a page resulted in a lot of pages displaying without CSS or JavaScript looking like they're comming from the 90s, after a few days.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17819565, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by susy, 9 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by DarkSpark, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17065198, 10 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by IlabSentuser, a year ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Sajid, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13000765, 2 years agothe new UI is totally messed up. How about an option to use the old UI? The text in the new UI is too large, lines wrap and are almost unreadable, the colors are ugly. NoScript is a great security tool for Firefox, but this new UI is the worst.
Developer response
posted 2 years agoCurrently NoScript is undergoing a professional accessibility review while introducing brand new & important user-facing features.
Please be patient: take changes in as experimental, rather than set in stone.
Feedback welcome as always: https://noscript.net/community
Thank you. - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14764041, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Arsen, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17095679, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17053030, 2 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 16927539, 2 years ago