- Rated 2 out of 5by przytula, 2 years agothe browser is now reflected as firefox 56 and google drive/site are complaining : not supported. after disable, it shows again firefox 92
- Rated 2 out of 5by JfmbLinux, 2 years agoI just tested your extension with this site: https://www.deviceinfo.me/ and surprise it's not that good.
Here is the response from the site "Supports real browser kernel detection even if the browser is spoofed, for: Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Internet Explorer, Safari, Opera, Konqueror."
- Rated 2 out of 5by Persen, 3 years agoWell that looks like to be it with YouTube as well.
I can't get it to deliver the classic YouTube any more on anything there when set to Google Bot.
YouTube sure wants to force that completely ugly polymer "tablet look" of theirs down peoples throats, even though they might risk loosing a ton of computer users because of this.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15160329, 4 years agoUsed to work well but Is now breaking sites. Please fix.
Developer responseposted 4 years agoSorry for the inconvience caused by the recent changes. Version 1.3.4 should now stop the remaining breakage from occuring. If you still observe issues please send some examples of broken sites and what is wrong with them so that I may take a look. Thanks!
- Rated 2 out of 5by Johnnatan, 4 years agono me gusto al no tener una lista de agentes antiguos pues esa es una funcion muy buena por ejemplo IE6
- Rated 2 out of 5by Travis Combs, 5 years agoI needed it for a particular website that only wanted to support Chrome. I downloaded this, installed it, and picked the only Chrome user-agent option (Chrome 59). The site then assumed I was on Chrome, but complained it was out-of-date so I couldn't use it. I found no way to use a newer user-agent, so this add-in does me no good.
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 11571316, 5 years agoVery inconvenient way of importing the user agent in text form.
Hello! I decided to use your supplement. But the first thing I did not like was the lack of the ability to auto-update user agents. I thought I could solve this problem by manually adding agents through the site https://techblog.willshouse.com/2012/01/03/most-common-user-agents/ On this site there is a string display of agents for example:
"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.113 Safari/537.36
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/61.0.3163.100 Safari/537.36"
But when I began to add them, they were wrong. It turned out that these lines should be edited and indicate which client is available in fact - dekstop or mobile ... It's not convenient! Is the add-on not able to determine whether the agent belongs to the OS on the line "... (Windows NT 10.0, Win64, x64) ..."?
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 13579924, 5 years agoDoesn't save the agents wich have been added by the user.