Bedømt til 1 ud af 5af Firefox-bruger 14986384, et år siden
Not only is it incapable of archiving any web page, but it also gives so many false positives when it thinks a site is down when it in fact is not.
- Bedømt til 5 ud af 5af Brammi, 14 dage sidenIch hatte nach einem HDD-Crash keinen Zugriff majhr auf meine alten Homepagedaten, die zum Teil älter als 15 Jahre waren. Mit der Wayback Machine konnte ich alte Seiten rekonstruieren, was mir sonst nicht gelungen wäre.
- Bedømt til 4 ud af 5af Firefox-bruger 13165481, 7 måneder sidenLong-time user here. I’m glad the add-on finally removed the privacy-harming log-in requirement for saving pages.
However, when I do want to stay logged in, the add-on repeatedly logs me out every few days or so, so I constantly have to log back in. Would be great if this was fixed and that you stayed logged in until you click the log-out button. If this gets fixed I’ll bump my rating up to 5/5.
- Bedømt til 5 ud af 5af twotwos, 8 måneder sidenOk. This extension used to be *bad*. It was limited in its use and had a serious problem with what I'm terming "archive misfire", where it would decide to redirect some pages (which would otherwise load just fine!) to a new page where it gave you the option to view it in the archive. When you didn't need to.
Yet now! As of February this year, the extension has leapt all the way from version 1.8.6 to version 3.0, and let me tell you, this version absolutely slaps. It's brilliant. Archive misfire is no more, and it's got all sorts of helpful little options. The Internet Archive has taken this extension from an over-agressive bookmarklet to a really quite helpful browsing tool. If you scorned this extension before, I invite you to give it another go; and if you're here for the first time, don't be scared off by the review score - truly, things are better now. Also, some other reviews mention needing to login to save pages, a requirement which has been lifted as of ~a month ago.