SingleFile 的評論
SingleFile 作者: gildas
評價 4.8 分，滿分 5 分
4.8 顆星，滿分 5 顆星
337 筆評論
- 來自 Firefox 使用者 13048311，4 個月前評價 4 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Radu Bogoevici，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Cormchij，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分Tried a lot of extensions. Your best. But it cuts the length of the file name by 140 characters. This is inconvenient. Can I remove this restriction?
開發者回應
張貼於 4 個月前Thank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help. - 來自 dinor studio，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 NocedaCloud，4 個月前評價 1 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Marce，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Wo，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 fuzzydorito，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 JFffox，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分I used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!開發者回應
張貼於 4 個月前Thank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - 來自 Firefox 使用者 13870051，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 triantafillia，4 個月前評價 3 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 茶几上的猫，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Cherwally，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Arioh，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Firefox 使用者 14738141，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Idan Nabara，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 i18n，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Marieli，4 個月前評價 4 分，滿分 5 分
- 來自 Abe，4 個月前評價 4 分，滿分 5 分Make sure to enable this for JavaScript (https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/blob/master/faq.md#why-dont-interactive-elements-like-folding-titles-dynamic-maps-or-carousels-work-properly-in-saved-pages).
Works great! However, I really feel like saving scripts, audio elements, etc. should be enabled by default.開發者回應
張貼於 4 個月前Thank you for the review. The default settings are optimized to produce light (and faithful) snapshot of pages because this was the most recurrent complain in the past. That's why the options you mentioned are disabled. Note also that disabling the option "remove scripts" can, unfortunately, lead to corrupted pages. - 來自 Firefox 使用者 15695469，4 個月前評價 5 分，滿分 5 分