RoboForm Password Manager 的評論
RoboForm Password Manager 作者: Siber Systems
197 筆評論
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18421625,11 天前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12106260,1 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Doug Scoggins,2 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 OK,4 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16365643,4 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18064073,5 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16914393,5 個月前L;OVEDIT AT FIRST THEN IT BEVAME COMPLACATED AND IT IS HARD FORME TO GT T INTO Y PROGRAS. IM AN OLD MAN AN NOT AS SHAR; AS I USED O BE AN ARTHRIIS ON MY FINGERS DOESNT HELP WITH MY TYPING
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15272233,5 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12825258,7 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15852206,7 個月前Roboform add on is not always popping up for me, to auto-fill forms or fill in passwords. Sometimes I have to copy paste from my desktop roboform. Kinda sicks.
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12585088,7 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Sam,7 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Fred,8 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 CatmanJoe,8 個月前It never stays "enabled" in Windows 10 startup, and there is no one to contact for assistance.
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 TC,8 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Rollie,8 個月前Right now I am very unhappy with RoboForm, because my license expired with NO notice that this was going to happen.
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 jeffrey,9 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 DaveA,9 個月前Functionally, this is a good password manager. The big negative is the requirement that you give them the access to all your searches in order to make the app operable.
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 waykno,9 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 15170229,10 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 アンクル,10 個月前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Anonymous,1 年前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 6869700,1 年前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Jeanne,1 年前I've been using Roboform for over 30 years. Started as a resident download only. Even then it was robust, too robust, actually. Help files, such as they were, were written by programmers and in techie words. I stayed with it and gradually figured out how to use the more complicated features, besides logins.
The problem now -- writing this for Firefox extension using Windows 11 -- is that the extension doesn't actually show in Firefox, even though it is installed.
In 1983 I had one of the first at least 50k IBM AT computers running DOS 1.1 or thereabouts. Very rudimentary. I learned as software came along. This extension for Mozilla Firefox is so complex that there is nothing within any documentation to help it work correctly. Lots of explanations, but no real help. I read everything and search before asking for help. The help search which returns old Q&A rarely answers my questions.
Seems every software uses this sort of community system along with what user manuals they have. There should have been a "law" that ONLY new users be allowed to write manuals and help systems, so they are not written by engineers who already know all the is and outs. Oh, well. I will keep using RF and its extensions, but like everything else it gets bigger and more and more to the point where it outlives its original purpose and is so complex as to make it close to useless.
Our capitalist system works when companies expand, make more money, etc. It is too bad most software isn't "fixed" before more things are added. But then companies couldn't add new features to compete and make more money. I don't know the answer to any of this. I don't think there is one.
I still recommend RF to people. I've never had any sort of breach. - 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17041837,1 年前I've been using Robo for about 7 years and obviously I've seen the product become what it is today. It's great when its working and frustrating when its not...For me some of the changes that drives me up the wall is the app has added too much fluff that is unnecessary, e.g.,not listing the names of my sites instead showing trade-mark pictures. Nice but not necessary. This is just one of several examples. Management should be thinking, "Make it easy for the customer to buy from ..." and "Less is more"