NoScript Security Suite 的評論
NoScript Security Suite 作者: Giorgio Maone
robsku 所留下的評論
評價 5 分,滿分 5 分
來自 robsku,4 年前I'm sorry I wrote a bad review. It seems to be deleted, although it was not inappropriate - it was mistaken, and PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THIS *FEATURE*; whether intentional or not.
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
We now have a possibility to use Multi-Container support of Firefox with NoScript; I was very bummed by the missing of ABE from the WebExtension, but this can do some of the same thing; and without understanding the almost esoteric syntax.
See, I though the permissions I had set were disappearing. Turns out the page was in separate container than the last time I had allowed those permissions. The permissions are *CONTAINER SPECIFIC*. I hadn't really properly put Multi-User Container add-on really to good use!
Now I don't lose permissions. I can have certain (all possible to keep things working) Google servers blocked on default - same with any FaceBook servers. In fact, FaceBook servers are only allowed on FaceBook container. And if a site that does not belong to YouTube container, but needs to show video from YouTube, I either temporarily allow the servers, or I move the site into YouTube container; which needs a good good reason if it's not a Google's YouTube services. OR, I'll add another container for pages that don't need all the YouTube and Google servers allowed, but need to have just those allowed that let the videos roll; and move that site there. This is in fact incredibly great way to work, although I still miss the Legacy version - I will soon try changing to a fork that has all the modern support of FF, and support for legacy add-on's. Then I can use the original, and get the massive power of ABE, but will the Legacy code be updated to have same support for multiple containers? That I would love, best of both worlds.
I even have a container for MyWOT.com, which everyone should know already is a scam itself, but the user reviews are real - and great. So that container shouldn't be able to reach any info not loaded while in that very container. And only MyWOT.com ever is.
P.S. I'm 95% certain I wrote a bad review lately - I even deleted the old good one before that, so I didn't just imagine it all, as it's gone. So what happened?
P.P.S. I was really hard thinking of giving you five stars, because it was stated that all the features of legacy version were available here as well. Well, I remember a lot of settings I see nowhere; most notable of them being ABE rulesets. So I almost didn't, just 4; here's your 5 stars anyway ;)
FINALLY: You have to make users so clear about this multi-container feature, that they don't get mistaken like I did. If they use multi-containers, they should easily understand it; if not, what does it matter? ;) But definitely make it clear and clearly shown ;)
2,205 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Guará,6 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18377949,8 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 rawhead2222,12 天前Für mich das beste und gleichzeitig auch einfachste Sicherheits- Ad-On welches jemals kostenlos der Allgemeinheit zugänglich gemacht wurde.
Ich weiß gar nicht mehr seit wie vielen Jahren ich es benutze, ich glaube kurz nach dem Entstehen von einer der ersten Versionen.
Also ein oder eineinhalb oder mehr Jahrzehnte,
ich bin mittlerweile wirklich gealtert,
No Script zum Glück nicht‼️
Ganz großen Respekt an den Entwickler 🙏❤️👍 - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 lundbelt,13 天前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 jo bre,19 天前
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Эндрю,22 天前Я не хочу отключать Script полностью мне необходимо выбрать то, что будет работать и что не должно работать, если в этом приложении и есть такая функция, то её не легко получить
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 SuperCuek,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 StrippyTip,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12449458,1 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Avi,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Ice of Spades,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 8tt0,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13319614,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Elverpueh,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18229690,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18044618,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 phony9998,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14883967,1 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18055457,1 個月前This is simply an outstanding Extension that allows us to surf the web without most of the hassle that sites want to impose onto us. Remember that a lot of sites are basically ad platforms pretending to provide services. This lets you own the web (if you use it with other useful and appropriate extensions).
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Tyson Mann,2 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 WAY008,2 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 user doe,2 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Yuri M.,2 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Nimja,2 個月前Fantastic way of controlling websites. You have to take a bit of time to understand it to be able to use it though
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 potentially dubious wizard,2 個月前