Unpaywall 的评价
Unpaywall 作者: Impactstory team
Firefox 用户 13958296 的评价
评分 2 / 5
来自 Firefox 用户 13958296,6 年前TL;DR:
Implement the best possible interface, regardless of lazy users' concerns, then create an easy version for them. Or at least make a second version that follows best-practices. Somewhat redundant program, otherwise. But great idea, and there's certainly something to be said for the fact that you've pursued the idea to this extent.
Full comment:
Echoing the sentiments of another reviewer, and the respective reply from dev...
"Best-practices" in mind, it's too bad that they're being sullied in favour of unskilled-user-friendliness. Kind of ends up being user-unfriendly for those who would use in a more 'serious'/efficient capacity...
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that best-practices ought to be pursued foremost, otherwise the tool becomes an interface nightmare for those who want to use it efficiently and thoughtfully. You'd end up with a better product and that's the best scenario for a creator. A lite version is perfectly reasonable once that's taken care of.
I appreciate what you've done, though, and understand where you're coming from. It's a fantastic idea, but problematic roll-out philosophy for me. Ends up being a bit of another time-consuming hoop to jump through which sort of defeats the purpose for those who are capable, yet looking to streamline the search and organization process.
Implement the best possible interface, regardless of lazy users' concerns, then create an easy version for them. Or at least make a second version that follows best-practices. Somewhat redundant program, otherwise. But great idea, and there's certainly something to be said for the fact that you've pursued the idea to this extent.
Full comment:
Echoing the sentiments of another reviewer, and the respective reply from dev...
"Best-practices" in mind, it's too bad that they're being sullied in favour of unskilled-user-friendliness. Kind of ends up being user-unfriendly for those who would use in a more 'serious'/efficient capacity...
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that best-practices ought to be pursued foremost, otherwise the tool becomes an interface nightmare for those who want to use it efficiently and thoughtfully. You'd end up with a better product and that's the best scenario for a creator. A lite version is perfectly reasonable once that's taken care of.
I appreciate what you've done, though, and understand where you're coming from. It's a fantastic idea, but problematic roll-out philosophy for me. Ends up being a bit of another time-consuming hoop to jump through which sort of defeats the purpose for those who are capable, yet looking to streamline the search and organization process.
227 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 eltopo,22 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Nguyễn Ngọc Thành,2 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Not~ryuu,3 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Colt,4 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 maya,5 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 17943208,5 个月前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Mikalo,5 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12337949,6 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 srcµ.,6 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Anna F. Phillips,6 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 cpta1203,7 个月前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Expert Plus 🍀,7 个月前Doesn't works on this page -> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-02-08/how-jack-dorsey-s-plan-for-elon-musk-to-save-twitter-failed
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Numa,7 个月前It does exactly what it says, and has an extensive repertoire of academic papers. Definitely recommend it. This has saved me hours.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 gene_wood,9 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18202490,9 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 phazec,10 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 15083741,10 个月前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Venkat,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Arin,1 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 shoo,1 年前
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Caio,1 年前