Recensioner för WOT - Surfa säkert
WOT - Surfa säkert av WOT Services
605 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Mikis, för 10 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Alex, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av zluka505, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av MaSHiNiK, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av James Barcus, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Laconia, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 13361995, för ett år sedanЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av kriztmark hacking session, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18068857, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18040293, för ett år sedanA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för ett år sedanHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Coiialj, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Philip Goddard, för ett år sedan(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18002481, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18002124, för ett år sedanrecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för ett år sedanHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Matthew Conrad, för 2 år sedanUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 2 år sedanHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Betygsatt 1 av 5av pelle, för 2 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av 天灭中共退党团队保平安, för 2 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17847732, för 2 år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 17832293, för 2 år sedanMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 2 år sedanHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können. - Betygsatt 3 av 5av user, för 2 år sedanURL check is paid. Tracker blocking is paid.
They aren't clear about paid features beforehand. Their main website mywot.com is horrible with details now. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14954560, för 2 år sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av kaiete, för 2 år sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 13958735, för 2 år sedanI have been using for years. I like having the sites rating provided for me. All the additional features are unnecessary for me given that I use other extensions. Recently I found this application was blocking sites I had otherwise whitelisted. I don't know how to easily resolve so uninstalling was quickest solution.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17763019, för 2 år sedanУстановила расширение на ноутбук, работой довольна. Предупреждает об угрозах и безопасности сайтов. Программа ненавязчива, сообщает об угрозах в реальных случаях.