Recensioner för Exif Viewer
Exif Viewer av Alan Raskin
23 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18759660, för 7 månader sedanWorks just like an Exif viewer should! I might wish that I could lock its window position and size rather than having it try and guess for me, but other than that it's great.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Victoria, för 3 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av kaengu, för 5 år sedanEasy to use and extremely useful - thanks for providing this!
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Little frog, för 5 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 15217214, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av AX11, för 6 år sedanDoes exactly what is says. Works pretty well, instantly gives detailed info about image metadata.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14947076, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14897228, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14694902, för 6 år sedanThis plug in was very, very good until Firefox killed its usefulness to any file on the local hard drive, such as image files received or sent via email, those downloaded from a thumb drive, or those taken and saved on a local hard drive by the computer owner. Firefox in some sort of misguided, perhaps just thoughtless, security move destroyed the ability to use Firefox in a fully functional way as photographers had done previously for many, many years. Too bad for us photographers. But, who cares about us, eh? So, now off to investigate using some other browser that actually might be fully functional for looking at photographs, including my own.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14685272, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14652109, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14565026, för 6 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14103221, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14089545, för 7 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14035284, för 7 år sedanPara ver EXIF de las imágenes, autor, datos de cámara, parámetros de la fotografía... EL MEJOR!!!
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13744732, för 8 år sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av DeronLJ, för 8 år sedanVery handy add-on to display a huge amount of detail about an image.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13346095, för 8 år sedanA nice and useful module. Thanks!
However, it would be even better if we could select what type of visualization we want, instead of having to go in a sub-menu to pick one among four presentations (table, basic, etc.). A settings option would be a welcome.
Moreover, it would be faster to parse visually if we could select which attributes to display or hide.
As a bonus, a possibility to override the default CSS would be nice (I'm thinking about lowering the contrast and size of attribute codes), but maybe overkill too! :) - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 13327053, för 8 år sedanNew version (3.0) cannot be installed, FF says it's corrupt... Please, fix it.
Thanks.
EDIT: Thanks, but it didn't help, my FF ESR 52.4.0 (32-bit) still says it's corrupt. I fixed it by modifying manifest.json (un-commenting "applications" section and changed min version to 52...) Maybe you could make it compatible to ESR too...Utvecklarens svar
postad för 8 år sedanI just removed and re-installed it on my system, and it worked fine. A couple of other users were also able to install it without any problems. You might want to try removing it, exiting from Firefox, and then re-installing it from addons.mozilla.org; perhaps the download failed. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av andrew, för 8 år sedanThanks for the update!
I have a problem - long time of loading result with large files.Utvecklarens svar
postad för 8 år sedanYes.
The "legacy" version could stream the image's binary data a little at a time, since it was able to use the XPCOM interface to access Firefox's functionality.
The WebExtensions version is much more restricted, because it is treated much the same as any web page, and so it has to download the entire image before it can process it.
Out of curiosity, what are your browser's cache settings? I'd hope that the Viewer's request for the image has access to the cache, but maybe not.
- Alan