29 análises
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 16879233, a há 2 mesesUnfortunately this addon breaks some sites, such as bol.com. There is no way to whitelist sites and therefore the AddonOn is not very useful
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por ee, a há 5 mesescannot clear youtube redirect links. heck, it can't even clear the amo redirect links.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por ThanxBiotch, a há 7 mesesHasn't even tried to fix the sorting problem if used while shopping. Position of ignoring request or criticism disregards the apps' intent. Is this because the data collected is sold to them? Wouldn't that be the instance when "cleaning" would be most useful?
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Janky, a há 7 mesesPossible to get pretty similar result through blocklist in ublock.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12719497, a há 9 mesesBreaks all websites. Apparently also breaks DNS resolvers.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Bazoogle, a há 10 mesesDesperately needs a whitelist feature. If you want one site to work, you have to disable it entirely, which is far worse than just allowing one URL.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Synetech, a há um anoThis extensions writes to the drive at least twice per minute. WTH does it have to write? 🤨 I'm not going to wear down my SSD with unnecessary writes from an extension that has no business writing data at all. 😒
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 17692673, a há um anoBreaks some websites without the ability to exclude it.
Example is Firebase "App Distribution" page, which it ruins its ability to just download APK files. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por goofball, a há um anoAs many others have said, it does its job but breaks many sites and doesn't support an allow-list to un-break them.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 15286977, a há um ano
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por binaural, a há 2 anosWorked really well - until I realised it was breaking a number of sites.
As _everyone_ is writing: this needs an allow list! - Avaliado em 2 de 5por MrGoatsy, a há 2 anosFills up browser history with both the tracked URL and the non tracked URL.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Ulfric, a há 2 anosThis was a decent add-on that I forgot about and let run wild, but unfortunately the lack of a whitelist means I cannot get much use out of this anymore. For some reason it recently broke Pocket's inline articles, and I found out from the reviews that it breaks certain features in Gmail as well (which I didn't connect to this add-on until now!). Please add a whitelist, or at least more user flexibility in terms of maneuvering through features that may break important website features.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por aconamos, a há 2 anosThis extension works great other than that it has completely broken google OAuth for me. I have had to disable it which sucks because I really like this extension.
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12370795, a há 2 anosA whitelist would have been great.
But the main issue is that it breaks so many website that most of the time I leave it disabled. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 12397002, a há 2 anosThis extension would be great… if it didn't break 𝘴𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘴. The worst being 3-D Secure payment redirections.
I end up leaving it disabled most of the time.
Maybe the first feature that this extension would have required is an easily manageable custom whitelist. I'll have to look into the contribution requirements one of those days… - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Intrepid, a há 3 anosNo longer being updated. Bug reports go answered and are not fixed. Causes malfunctions with many websites such as Amazon search result sorting (e.g., Sort by: Price Low to High). No way to exclude websites like you can do with uBlock Origin. ClearURLs would be great if it had this one feature. Without this option, turning it on and off is an annoyance. Sadly, I'm leaving it off, and just using it's right click ability to clean / shorten URLs on an as needed basis. Bummer. Update: Someone responded to the Amazon bug and provided a workaround here:
https://gitlab.com/KevinRoebert/ClearUrls/-/issues/677/ - Avaliado em 2 de 5por kelendral, a há 3 anosWorks OK, but breaks a number of sites and has no option to disable on a per site basis that I found.
As such it became a nuisance having to disable/enable at once or twice a day for important sites. - Avaliado em 2 de 5por Imp, a há 3 anosMany elements I'd like to block a to clever to be blocked due to changing URLs. It would be neccessary to add a console with * and ? to add flexible-named URL-parts to be blocked