Recensioni per Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike di Dmitry Selivanov
4736 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di petethecanuck, 13 ore fagreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Valutata 4 su 5di Sweet Citrus, 14 ore faI would rate it a 5 but this extension is not working right now. I do not have a Discord so I cannot report it to you. I am hoping my review would be enough for you to notice it. I do not know if it is my fault or YouTube's or it is just a bug. Hope you will fix it soon.
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 17708027, 4 giorni faПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Valutata 5 su 5di Zelgadis-San, 5 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Juraj Mäsiar, 9 giorni faThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Valutata 3 su 5di Utente Firefox 13519206, 11 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18900251, 11 giorni faThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 11 giorni faI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Valutata 5 su 5di Riku70X, 14 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di malisipi, 14 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di placidtea, 16 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Spigot, 16 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Dale Cooper, 17 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18909402, 17 giorni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Kiwi18, 18 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 15889624, 19 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Cameron Owens, 19 giorni faI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 19 giorni faGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Valutata 1 su 5di kuroten, 21 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Nicky McCurdy, 21 giorni faThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18144459, 21 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 19547104, 22 giorni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di qawas, 23 giorni faStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 23 giorni faMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 23 giorni faMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much.- Valutata 2 su 5di Chantelle, 23 giorni faThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 23 giorni faYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.