Critiques pour Firefox Multi-Account Containers
Firefox Multi-Account Containers par Mozilla Firefox
Avis de Amazing Mr. X
Noté 2 sur 5
par Amazing Mr. X, il y a 2 ansThis has a lot of potential, but it's not quite ready for prime time. There's a few specific problems here:
Firstly, add-ons can't communicate with the content of containers. This breaks functionality in most add-ons in really weird and unexpected ways. It'd be nice if we could whitelist add-ons to have access to relevant containers, but most users would probably want all of their add-ons to have full access to all of their containers by default and wouldn't expect them to be functionally blocked as they are.
Secondly, containers don't nicely handle redirects. A lot of sites, especially corporate ones, will redirect through several different domains and subdomains when performing the login process. Containers set to "Limit to Designated Sites" won't operate correctly with these redirects as the redirect pages are not true web pages and don't allow you to sit on them long enough to click the address bar button to always open them in the specified container. This cannot currently be remedied by having foreknowledge of the complete list of redirect sites, as the "Limit to Designated Sites" list cannot be manually edited or appended outside of the limited address bar button method.
Thirdly, The VPN integration isn't particularly secure in premise. Being a per-container opt-in means that entities snooping on the line will immediately see that there's something suspiciously different in the data packets coming from your protected containers compared to the rest of your typical https encrypted traffic. This makes isolating these packets, on the fly, infuriatingly trivial. Making this a per-container opt-out would all but eliminate this problem, as attackers would have to have foreknowledge of the originating container to do this effectively in all circumstances. It'd also be great to see connection protocol options ( OpenVPN, WireGuard, etc. ) as well as other VPN provider options as that'd make it that much harder to try and figure out what's going on in the encrypted container traffic and would better protect Mozilla VPN itself. Right now it's technically more secure to not use the VPN feature at all.
I think the basic idea here is really excellent, but these problems really do drag it down. Something made and maintained by Mozilla shouldn't have this many problems. I still think this is potentially useful to certain technical professionals trying to isolate their sensitive internal sites from other web apps, but the average user is going to have too many headaches to be able to use this effectively.
If you know what you're doing, keep the above points in-mind and go ahead and give it a try.
Anyone else? Hope Mozilla addresses some of these issues in a future release. I'll update my review if they do.
Firstly, add-ons can't communicate with the content of containers. This breaks functionality in most add-ons in really weird and unexpected ways. It'd be nice if we could whitelist add-ons to have access to relevant containers, but most users would probably want all of their add-ons to have full access to all of their containers by default and wouldn't expect them to be functionally blocked as they are.
Secondly, containers don't nicely handle redirects. A lot of sites, especially corporate ones, will redirect through several different domains and subdomains when performing the login process. Containers set to "Limit to Designated Sites" won't operate correctly with these redirects as the redirect pages are not true web pages and don't allow you to sit on them long enough to click the address bar button to always open them in the specified container. This cannot currently be remedied by having foreknowledge of the complete list of redirect sites, as the "Limit to Designated Sites" list cannot be manually edited or appended outside of the limited address bar button method.
Thirdly, The VPN integration isn't particularly secure in premise. Being a per-container opt-in means that entities snooping on the line will immediately see that there's something suspiciously different in the data packets coming from your protected containers compared to the rest of your typical https encrypted traffic. This makes isolating these packets, on the fly, infuriatingly trivial. Making this a per-container opt-out would all but eliminate this problem, as attackers would have to have foreknowledge of the originating container to do this effectively in all circumstances. It'd also be great to see connection protocol options ( OpenVPN, WireGuard, etc. ) as well as other VPN provider options as that'd make it that much harder to try and figure out what's going on in the encrypted container traffic and would better protect Mozilla VPN itself. Right now it's technically more secure to not use the VPN feature at all.
I think the basic idea here is really excellent, but these problems really do drag it down. Something made and maintained by Mozilla shouldn't have this many problems. I still think this is potentially useful to certain technical professionals trying to isolate their sensitive internal sites from other web apps, but the average user is going to have too many headaches to be able to use this effectively.
If you know what you're doing, keep the above points in-mind and go ahead and give it a try.
Anyone else? Hope Mozilla addresses some of these issues in a future release. I'll update my review if they do.
6 995 notes
- Noté 4 sur 5par D.O.D., il y a un jour
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18402334 de Firefox, il y a un jour
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18389768 de Firefox, il y a 2 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15771680 de Firefox, il y a 4 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par rottosotam, il y a 5 joursIt lacks the option to input manually an site into a container so one doesn't have to first open the site and then make it into the container.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18192393 de Firefox, il y a 5 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Skinnx86, il y a 6 joursImmensely useful working as a sysadmin for multiple clients. Logging in to accounts all day is made easier with Firefox container tabs.
Edge, eat your heart out, I don't need to have an entire separate window open to perform the same task!!! Makes my colleagues go brrr.... - Noté 4 sur 5par Ordi_P, il y a 7 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18392732 de Firefox, il y a 8 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par CHKH, il y a 11 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Compunut, il y a 11 joursThis extension is one of a handful that absolutely make Firefox my preference over alternatives. This is a great tool for keeping things isolated. I can help family by logging into their accounts in a family container without disrupting my logins to the same services, as an example. It is awesome!
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18259625 de Firefox, il y a 12 joursI love you! I support your work (give money) I sign all the petitions , I wish I could do more but I am a techno peasant and worst after I retired! and the pandemic
- Noté 5 sur 5par Patrick Symlogia, il y a 13 joursI work with many Microsoft 365 portals open - this add-on lets me bounce between customers without having to log in and out continuously.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13167447 de Firefox, il y a 13 joursVery good really useful for me
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18383768 de Firefox, il y a 15 joursWish it would work, but asks me EVERY SINGLE TIME I open a new tab, if I want it opened in a specific container, then doesn't remember for next time. Figure it oot.
- Noté 4 sur 5par Emanoel, il y a 15 jours
- Noté 4 sur 5par Gustavo, il y a 16 joursI think the only thing it needs to be perfect it's some new icons
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ha., il y a 16 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Avabo, il y a 19 joursIt's amazing what the original facebook container has turned into. This is a must for anyone with privacy concerns or worried about cookies tracking your every move.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18378339 de Firefox, il y a 19 jours
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17717839 de Firefox, il y a 19 joursБесполезное расширение, VPN не работает, после удаление остается куча пунктов в меню
- Noté 5 sur 5par Toni, il y a 20 jours
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18376288 de Firefox, il y a 20 jours