Reviews for Speed Tweaks
Speed Tweaks by Benthum
Review by Firefox user 15262702
Rated 5 out of 5
by Firefox user 15262702, 5 years ago33 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by squall leonhart, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14784713, 2 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14643647, 3 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Fanca Andian, 4 years ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Firefox user 13808638, 4 years agoThe idea is very good but; when I select the add-on, the drop-down panel is too small and I cannot see all the text.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Holy Answers, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 16170120, 4 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Michael, 5 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Slapchop83, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14613375, 5 years ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15254282, 5 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by rosekitsune1, 5 years agoI like this add-on but.... I use Firefox nightly 70 64 bit for windows 10 1903 laptop and... I can't get the dropdown menu to show up like it use to.
- Rated 5 out of 5by ChuckDub, 5 years ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Joabe, 6 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 14608288, 6 years agothis works, but upon checking my task manager. I found that this took too much cpu resources. Check your task manager and you will see the same thing
- Rated 2 out of 5by Mrowa378, 6 years agoThe worst drawback is that it changes the appearance of my email account to mobile if it is not that this add-on has not received such an assessment :-( when you eliminate something like automatically changing the appearance of mail in the next update I will give 5+ and still do something to be definitely the window has been expanded and enlarged because these settings subtitles can not be seen in their entirety :-(
- Rated 1 out of 5by xeem, 6 years ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by rafaelrichards, 6 years agoPOWER HOG. Firefox goes from 5% cpu to 200% CPU consumption when this is toggled on. See other one-star review, which gives same reason. Maybe, just maybe, there may be some speed boost, but it is not noticeable. But the CPU cycles this takes is ridiculous. Disabled/Deleted.
- Rated 4 out of 5by bharatgkmsrgroup, 6 years agoIt will be better if this extension has a option for setting images quality
- Rated 5 out of 5by northern.Akrabu, 6 years ago