Reviews for Nightly Tester Tools
Nightly Tester Tools by Automation Development, Henrik Skupin, xabolcs, Kohei Yoshino
Review by CASANOVA
- Rated 1 out of 5by Critt, 3 years agoUseless. Does not integrate into the tools menu and therefore you have no access to anything within this add-on.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Phillip, 4 years agoIf you want to copy something that you wouldn't normally want to, this is the extension for you.
WebExtensionAPI has pretty much sent everything else down the loo.
- Rated 1 out of 5by PERCE-NEIGE, 4 years agoI used this one for "force addon compatibility". Missing greatly.
Developer responseposted 4 years agoPlease see https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nightly-tester-tools/reviews/1095111/, where we already described why it's not needed anymore. Where exactly do you have problems?
If that fixes your problem please reconsider the rating of the extension. Thanks.
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 13910128, 5 years agoHow can i use "Force Addon Compatibility"...
Developer responseposted 5 years agoJust in short this feature is not necessary anymore since Firefox 57 when only extensions based on the WebExtension API are allowed in Firefox. As such it has been removed.
If you have problems with a feature you should contact the support site or send an email instead of writing negative reviews on AMO. We would be happy if you could adjust your rating. Thanks.
- Rated 1 out of 5by OneLag, 5 years agoSadly it doesn't work anymore to force addons compatibility =(
- Rated 4 out of 5by grahamperrin, 5 years agoI'll use this occasionally with Waterfox.
More generally – for any Firefox-like browser – identifying extensions primarily by name is troublesome. Because addons.mozilla.org (AMO) too often makes it unnecessarily difficult to find by name; because developers too often use multiple names for a single product; and so on – so I can't give five stars.
The extension could be improved by more positively identifying extensions. Include:
- either the AMO address of the extension, non-localised, for example https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/nightly-tester-tools/
- or (if not listed on AMO) ideally the support URL, less ideally the home URL.
If no URLs is associated with the extension, be explicit about the absence of a support URL.
Developer responseposted 5 years agoThank you for the review. Also those are helpful information in how we can make NTT a better extension. Would you mind to file those as new issues in our issue tracker on github? We would kinda appreciate it, and make sure that it will be included in one of the future releases.
The issue tracker can be found here: https://github.com/mozilla/nightlytt/issues