Reviews for Nano Defender for Firefox
Nano Defender for Firefox by LiCybora
147 reviews
- by HardKoreG, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by eriador, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5Truly excellent. I've been using the unofficial ND from github for months with uBlock and it works great. Very pleased to see it now on AMO... Thanks for porting to Firefox!
- by Will, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Valmont, 3 years agoRated 4 out of 5Ok, I have enough of it (of getting this to work). It looked like the devs fixed it, but here's the issue:
Installed Nano Defender and Nano Adblocker to keep it simple. Both from AMO. Doesn't work on certain websites though. For example for imgView.net, https://imgrock.pw/ , https://imgtown.pw and so forth.
Tried the quick issue submitter, but it gave me a hard time. It said the issue is fixed. Maybe it was, but it's not anymore. So I was required to go to Github. Little bit too nerdy for me. Spent half an hour just to find a unused username to sign up.
I did try to add the issue, but I did it wrong and I can't be bothered to "study" how to report an issue. You almost need a license just to be able to report something. I'm happy with simply being an end-user.
Two stars for the effort because I don't like 1 star. But right now it hasn't been a success for me.
Edit: added a star because it looks like the devs are really trying. This is a toughie though.
Edit 2: added another star (to 4) because it does a good job overall.Developer response
posted 3 years agoThe reason we need multiple information because we cannot reproduce issue for those sites. Therefore we ask for step to reproduce, screenshot and console in order to know what's wrong. Although it is complicated for reporters, those are required or we cannot fix without knowing the cause.
Even though your issue being closed as invalid, you can still modify your issue. Once your issue can be reproduced, your issue will be re-considered (this time I edit for you for your reference).
Edit: Your issue is confirmed and we are working on your issue right now. Please wait for next version for fix. - by ziggy, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by kranazoli[HUN], 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Hitomi, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by BALTAGY, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14859106, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14836706, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Tan, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14791975, 3 years agoRated 1 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14780594, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Sageru, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by ky0k4su1g3tsu, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Cincin Masuk Mangkok, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14072894, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5For who complain about its invasive permissions: well... That's what essentially make out of a blocker. What you can do is just to choose appropriate developers to trust.
- by winwinner, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14733392, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 13846949, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14722554, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Firefox user 14719299, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5
- by Leonardo, 3 years agoRated 5 out of 5