Aby toś te dodanki wužywał, musyśo Firefox ześěgnuś.

Pśizjawiś
Dodankowy symbol

Pógódnośenja za Return YouTube Dislike

Return YouTube Dislike wót Dmitry Selivanov

4,7 z 5 gwězdkow
5
4.186
4
167
3
72
2
50
1
261
Wótegrono wót Dmitry Selivanov

Wótegrono wuwijarja

jo se napisał 3 år siden
That was a typo, ofc for firefox version - it will be Mozilla who approve the update (and google for the Chrome version)
4.736 pógódnośenjow
  • wót aUser, 3 timer siden
  • wót petethecanuck, 3 timer siden
    great add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
  • wót Sweet Citrus, 3 timer siden
    I would rate it a 5 but this extension is not working right now. I do not have a Discord so I cannot report it to you. I am hoping my review would be enough for you to notice it. I do not know if it is my fault or YouTube's or it is just a bug. Hope you will fix it soon.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17708027, 3 dager siden
    Полезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
  • wót Zelgadis-San, 5 dager siden
  • wót Juraj Mäsiar, 9 dager siden
    Thank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13519206, 10 dager siden
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18900251, 11 dager siden
    The Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.

    The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.

    Wótegrono wuwijarja

    jo se napisał 10 dager siden
    I was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users.
  • wót Riku70X, 14 dager siden
  • wót malisipi, 14 dager siden
  • wót placidtea, 15 dager siden
  • wót Spigot, 16 dager siden
  • wót Dale Cooper, 16 dager siden
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18909402, 17 dager siden
  • wót Kiwi18, 18 dager siden
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15889624, 18 dager siden
  • wót Cameron Owens, 19 dager siden
    I know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.

    Wótegrono wuwijarja

    jo se napisał 18 dager siden
    Going to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing.
  • wót kuroten, 21 dager siden
  • wót Nicky McCurdy, 21 dager siden
    This extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18144459, 21 dager siden
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19547104, 21 dager siden
  • wót qawas, 22 dager siden
    Stay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.

    Wótegrono wuwijarja

    jo se napisał 22 dager siden
    Monetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.

    Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free

    All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.

    Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.


    The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much.
  • wót Wužywaŕ Firefox 6120711, 23 dager siden
    asking for premium for such a simple addon

    Wótegrono wuwijarja

    jo se napisał 22 dager siden
    Monetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.

    Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free

    All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.

    Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.


    The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much.
  • wót Chantelle, 23 dager siden
    The iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
  • wót Carnoso, 23 dager siden
    begger

    Wótegrono wuwijarja

    jo se napisał 22 dager siden
    Yeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.