Pógódnośenja za Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike wót Dmitry Selivanov
Pógódnośenja wót Robert Redmon
Z 5 z 5 pógódnośony
wót Robert Redmon, vor 3 Jahren4.736 pógódnośenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót aUser, vor einem Tag
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót petethecanuck, vor einem Taggreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Sweet Citrus, vor einem Tag[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17708027, vor 4 TagenПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Zelgadis-San, vor 6 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Juraj Mäsiar, vor 10 TagenThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13519206, vor 11 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18900251, vor 12 TagenThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał vor 11 TagenI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Riku70X, vor 15 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót malisipi, vor 15 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót placidtea, vor 16 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Spigot, vor 17 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Dale Cooper, vor 17 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18909402, vor 18 Tagen
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Kiwi18, vor 19 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15889624, vor 19 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cameron Owens, vor 20 TagenI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał vor 19 TagenGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót kuroten, vor 22 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Nicky McCurdy, vor 22 TagenThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18144459, vor 22 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19547104, vor 23 Tagen
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót qawas, vor 23 TagenStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał vor 23 TagenMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 6120711, vor 24 Tagenasking for premium for such a simple addon
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał vor 23 TagenMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Chantelle, vor 24 TagenThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał vor 23 TagenYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.