Pógódnośenja za Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike wót Dmitry Selivanov
Pógódnośenja wót Aktkrediktov
Z 5 z 5 pógódnośony
wót Aktkrediktov, hace 4 años4.736 pógódnośenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót aUser, hace 3 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót petethecanuck, hace 3 díasgreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Sweet Citrus, hace 3 días[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17708027, hace 6 díasПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Zelgadis-San, hace 8 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Juraj Mäsiar, hace 12 díasThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13519206, hace 14 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18900251, hace 14 díasThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał hace 13 díasI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Riku70X, hace 17 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót malisipi, hace 17 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót placidtea, hace 18 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Spigot, hace 19 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Dale Cooper, hace 20 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18909402, hace 20 días
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Kiwi18, hace 21 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15889624, hace 21 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cameron Owens, hace 22 díasI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał hace 21 díasGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót kuroten, hace 24 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Nicky McCurdy, hace 24 díasThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18144459, hace 24 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19547104, hace 25 días
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót qawas, hace 25 díasStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał hace 25 díasMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 6120711, hace un mesasking for premium for such a simple addon
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał hace 25 díasMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Chantelle, hace un mesThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał hace 25 díasYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.