Pógódnośenja za Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike wót Dmitry Selivanov
Pógódnośenja wót Benuli
Z 5 z 5 pógódnośony
wót Benuli, pred 4 rokmi4.736 pógódnośenjow
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót aUser, pred 2 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót petethecanuck, pred 2 dňamigreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Sweet Citrus, pred 2 dňami[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 17708027, pred 5 dňamiПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Zelgadis-San, pred 7 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Juraj Mäsiar, pred 11 dňamiThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Z 3 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 13519206, pred 12 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18900251, pred 13 dňamiThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał pred 12 dňamiI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Riku70X, pred 16 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót malisipi, pred 16 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót placidtea, pred 17 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Spigot, pred 17 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Dale Cooper, pred 18 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18909402, pred 19 dňami
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Kiwi18, pred 19 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 15889624, pred 20 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Cameron Owens, pred 21 dňamiI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał pred 20 dňamiGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót kuroten, pred 22 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Nicky McCurdy, pred 23 dňamiThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Z 5 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 18144459, pred 23 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 19547104, pred 23 dňami
- Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót qawas, pred 24 dňamiStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał pred 24 dňamiMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 1 z 5 pógódnośonywót Wužywaŕ Firefox 6120711, pred 25 dňamiasking for premium for such a simple addon
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał pred 24 dňamiMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Z 2 z 5 pógódnośonywót Chantelle, pred 25 dňamiThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Wótegrono wuwijarja
jo se napisał pred 24 dňamiYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.