Windscribe - Free VPN and Ad Blocker 的評論
Windscribe - Free VPN and Ad Blocker 作者: Windscribe
61 筆評論
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14707494，7 年前Cut the bloatware. Why bundle a worse, closed-source, less customizable version of u-block origin when it can be installed separately?
開發者回應
張貼於 7 年前You're comparing apples and oranges, and even then, you're still wrong.
1. It's not closed source: https://github.com/Windscribe/browser-extensions-legacy
2. Does uBlock have access to proxies in 60 countries? No.
3. Does uBlock spoof proxy time or keep track of 3rd and first party cookies? No. - 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14706594，7 年前
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12640372，7 年前Works fine on Chrome but terrible on Firefox. Painfully slow in comparison to Chrome version and breaks internet connection.
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Mike Vaghur，7 年前Too slow for a VPN - often even unable to open web page, moreover to watch streeming videos. Very small limit of data. Browsec is more faster and have no traffic limit.
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14507826，7 年前Poor performance and doesn't work with a number of web sites.
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14255783，7 年前Firefox Version 61.0.1 for ubuntu 18.04
Cannot login, as widget closes when moving from login to password field.
The same issus as with NordVpn - 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 WONDERFUL WORLD，7 年前
- You could have an accessible description on your site on how to work with this add-on instead of disperse information mixed with pub and a cartoon for children.
If one does not pay, will have restrictions which put this add-on at the bottom of most others, and with such a reduces bandwidth, this useless add-on can be taken as an abusive pub. I see too many anonymous reviews, almost all of them with five stars. Have they noticed what I mentioned? I also see these so many anonymous reviews as a very big bite on your credibility. A proved hoax. - 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13912803，8 年前
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13715889，8 年前
- 評價 2 分，滿分 5 分來自 clarencechaan，8 年前