DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials 的評論
DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials 作者: DuckDuckGo
236 筆評論
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 BL4CK,3 年前Used to be my favorite seach engine. But since they started judging what is truth and what is not, what i should and what i should not see, there is no reason to use it anymore.DDG used to be about privacy AND FREEDOM (because you can't separate those two thing).
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 10782222,3 年前This site censors search results and is funded by a venture capitalist fund. If I could give DDG a minus rating I would. Don't trust me research it for yourself. There are a couple of search engines on Firefox that are private & not censored: Brave & Presearch.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Jason DiManna,3 年前Switched from Google originally and really enjoyed. Now public statements of filtering or censoring results disappoints me. Let me be the judge of what is fake news!
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Screw the Narrative,3 年前Moving to Brave. I don't want my searches to be "prioritized" based on someone else's opinion of what's true or not. See Ya.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14896160,3 年前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13997341,3 年前After years of using it im done whit DDG... "At DuckDuckGo, we've been rolling out search updates that down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation."
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Free to Decide 1971,3 年前I've been a long-time user and supporter of DuckDuckGo - telling friends and family it's a great alternative to Scroogle's manipulation and data tracking. I created an account today just to write a review and voice my displeasure for DDG's new policy of censorship.
I am an adult with the capacity for critical thinking and judging for myself whether someone has provided sufficient evidence to support their claim. I DON'T need and DON'T want a search provider to cultivate, eliminate, or discriminate the results that show up when I am searching for something.
I can no longer in good conscience support DDG, and will start using a different search provider going forward. They lost my support the moment they decided to censor the free flow of information. Even if they reversed their decision tomorrow, it will take some work for them to earn back my trust and support. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17328013,3 年前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 romantic_pessimist,3 年前First time i review an extension, and it is because it vastly undermined my trust in it. now won't be a major problem for my day to day life, but i'm not gonna embrace and wait till something i might find interesting or useful will be censored.
I'm gonna manually manage my adblock, and privacy setting, even if it suck, i find it essential for my well being to have the most extensive type of freedom i can get - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Ersultan,3 年前По факту собирает данные о пользователях, влияет на результаты поиска. Шлак! Разрабы пиздаболы
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Erolley,3 年前No point in using DDG anymore, it became the same thing as Google, use an alternative instead.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17327004,3 年前AI determining what i should see? Duck duck gone to the dustbin of history!
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 BJSully,3 年前At least Google doesn't hide [anymore] the fact it's nothing more than a political censorship entity. DDG is toast.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 13343953,3 年前Used to recommend DDG to people and used it myself for years on all my devices. I have now switched to Brave everywhere. Privacy AND anti-censorship.
There is a false dichotomy that being anti-censorship means being Alex Jones 2.0. This makes it easy to dismiss people's complaints
Facebook censored a peer-reviewed articled published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the most respected medical journals. Lack of transparency for how something is branded "fake news" is worrying.
The most respected newspapers promoted the "WMD in Iraq" years ago. But I guess propaganda machine is cool when brown kids are killed instead of those bought by rich couple abroad (see news of kids from paid surrogacy stuck in Ukraine).
I am sure an underpaid intern knows better about what is disinformation and what is true. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 || BeeBee ||,3 年前DuckDuckGo used to stand for Internet privacy. You ask us "Why You Should Care" ... guess you are right as it turns out the you don't care much no more since starting to censor search results. You have just lost my confidence reveling that you have become a player in the great narrative. Shame on you guys!
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Eliphaser,3 年前I used to really like DuckDuckGo but it joins the elite club of censoring.
The best way to fight disinformation and propaganda is to demistify it, argue it, present it and talk about it, analyse it and present the reality. This is not what DuckDuckGo seems to value. They would much rather down-rank searches from Russian media than let people forge their own opinions on the reality at hand.
A search engine taking party in a conflict is not just a political issue, but a poor sign that the search aspect only responds to what the owners of the engine want you to easily find rather than to leave you with an unfiltered list of what you are really looking for.
Currently, DuckDuckGo's search effectiveness on controversial topics now prove to be similar to that of Google's, with a little bit more privacy powdered onto it. Not exactly worth using anymore, and I certainly don't think they are trustworthy for quality searches if they do things like that. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Elofson,3 年前DuckDuckGo is now censoring search content that it considers "misinformation".
Use Brave Search instead. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17015801,3 年前I took it off on my computer and smartphone as I don't need a second Google. I don't need someone to tell me what I should look at.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 ftnwo2012,3 年前DDG représentait un peu une alternative pour un monde librement informé. À présent, en rejetant la Russie, ils rejoignent gogol et autres dans la droite ligne des mondialistes de Davos.
Bye bye ! - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17325015,3 年前Gabriel Weinberg, CEO, decide for me what I should and shouldn't be able to find when I'm searching for things.
If I wanted to be censored I would use google.
so, I'm out. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Wayyllon,3 年前Recently showed that they have a political bias in the Ukraine Russia conflict. I support Ukraine; however the entire idea behind their search engine is that they're unbiased.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17324263,3 年前BIG TECH FAR LEFT CONTROLLED- NOT TO BE TRUSTED ANYMORE, DELETE