Add custom search engine 的評論
Add custom search engine 作者: Tom Schuster
483 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Ninetynine,4 年前
- This is an elegant add-on that does what it should, with a minimum of clutter.
I'd like to submit a feature request (at the risk of adding clutter...). Currently, when a search string contains multiple words, the add on substitutes plus signs for the spaces between search terms. This works for most sites, but some require space characters (or %20) instead. It would be great to have an advanced option to choose which of these, or a custom character, is included in the string, on a per-site basis.
Thanks for a great add-on! - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16951590,4 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Григорий С.,4 年前Very useful extension! I like to use it)
Очень полезное дополнение (реализует то, что по идее можно сделать функцией по умолчанию), просмотрел исходный код, ничего подозрительного не нашел. - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16938578,4 年前Does exactly what it says, and does it very well. How this isn't a built-in feature of Firefox in 2021 boggles my mind.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 citizenserious,4 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Federico Calzoni,4 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16900742,4 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14191726,4 年前
- 評價 2 分,滿分 5 分來自 NormanFFox,4 年前For whatever reason I can no longer just type in search phrases into duckuckgo.com in the main url bar with my custom settings. I simply want dark themed These options. (https://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=duckduck+dark). along with unfiltered ad free results instead of blaring white in my duckuckgo search engine. I though it would be easy to tweak back to normal. This add-on seemed promising for that purpose, but now (Friday 4-23-2021) for whatever reason its flawed for me exactly the same way reviewer Noxanne said ith a 1 out of 5 star rating (11 days before me) is. All it did was send me to the customized duckduck page colored dark but without search results (as though I typed no search phrase at all! and just typed "duckduckgo.com" ). This add-on shouldn't even be necessary, but it sounds great if it works. Its obviously broken from some Upgrade of Firefox version 80something or maybe because I have he linux version? I don't know. Good luck developers.