Stylus 的评价
Stylus 作者： Stylus Team, Jeremy Schomery
1,180 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13790902， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13785391， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13778055， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 darvishalone， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Franklin Yu， 8 年前GitHub as a real bug tracker is really great. It’s important to get feedback about bug report.
- 评分 3 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12235071， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Stonecrusher， 8 年前Opensource, actively developed, great features and it works! Much better than the original Stylish (now bought and "developed" by data collection company).
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 12315754， 8 年前
开发者回应
发布于 8 年前We can't fix what we can't reproduce.
Please post a screenshot and an instruction how to make it happen.
And if you use FF 56 or older, please re-check it in a new browser profile with no other addons installed because in the old Firefox the full (classic) addons can affect WebExtensions.- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13608986， 8 年前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 RedSquanch， 8 年前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13604918， 8 年前Actually great (five stars), but suddenly - without playing around or doing anything - ALL my styles disappeared. Srsly, it has been fucking much time I spent into optimizing everything...
€: After restarting FF, everything is like before again. Consequently, went from 2 to 4 stars...开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Styles can only disappear due to a bug in the browser or disk failure. Stylus simply doesn't have the code to mass-delete the styles on a whim.
Always export the styles manually on the styles manager page if you don't have a system-wide periodic backup set up. In the future we'll probably add an internal database backup and external sync. - 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13402379， 8 年前It's a good alternative to Stylish. Just because it's opensource.
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 13603596， 8 年前Does not seem to work with containerized sites. FF57 with Mozilla's own Multi-Account Containers extension. Otherwise, thanks for the effort.
EDIT: Works when following workaround on github, although this way is rather primitive.开发者回应
发布于 8 年前Mozilla's implementation of Containers API is incompatible with some of the basic approaches we use for speed-up like direct access to the background script. Either the API will be fixed in the future or we'll try to rework our code.