Ocene za Link Status Redux
Link Status Redux — Juha Aatrokoski
29 ocen
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— technoxenoholic, pred 3 dneviextremely helpful for keeping track of already-visited pages such as videos and articles. unfortunately, the addon fails to recognize "link" and "link+tracking" as the same address. in cases such as youtube's randomly-appearing "&pp=" parameter additions to links (added to different links on the page with each refresh), the addon will not recognize that it should be flagging a video url as already visited. if such tracking parameters were ignored and the same link with and without the tracking parameters were considered synonymous (as it were), this addon would earn five stars.
edit to reply to developer: unfortunately my hunt for the perfect url-cleaner extension hasn't turned up anything that can de-track the links on a webpage yet -- only while copying links (by using a separate context menu option) or on click/request (navigating to the cleaned link; although some parameters still aren't cleaned unless i copy a clean link and paste into the url bar manually). i'm not familiar enough with javascript or jquery to pursue possible solutions to that end on my own, although from my research so far it seems to be possible for someone who *does* know how to do javascript/jquery(/possibly both?). should i find anything, i'll come back with another update. in the meantime i'll bump this addon rating to five stars since my only issue is an outside factor.Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 2 dnevomaI have also noticed this annoyance and agree that such functionality would be useful, but unfortunately it is "not possible" within the context and scope of LSR.
The first problem is that as it is entirely up to the website which search parameters are significant wrt. the page content ("v") and which are not ("pp"), you cannot just blindly ignore/remove parameters; you need to have a database matching websites to safe-to-remove (tracking) parameters, *and* you have to keep it up-to-date. This maintenance of its own database, or reliance on an external one, is out of scope for LSR.
The second problem is that the browser history API does not have good support for partial URL matching (when querying whether a a link is visited or not), and even if it did, things could get complicated (removing parameters from the middle, reordering of parameters, etc.). This is not an issue if all browsing is "sanitized" by stripping tracking parameters from both web page links and every request made (as clicking a link is not the only way that requests can happen). In such case partial matching is not needed as both pages and history lack tracking parameters.
The solution is to use a separate anti-tracking extension that does the full sanitization i.e. strips tracking parts from both page links and all requests. I have not looked into this at all, but I am pretty sure these add-ons do exist. However, some (if not all) of them *may* strip tracking info only from requests made, not from page links, in which case it does not help with LSR (in fact it could make it worse wrt. LSR). Let me know if you find a suitable one. - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 18530539, pred 3 meseci
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Hamid_Y2K, pred 2 letoma
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 17608465, pred 3 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 13207487, pred 3 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— grahamperrin, pred 3 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Vanav, pred 4 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Rui Andrada, pred 4 leti
- Ocenjeno z 3 od 5— stetor, pred 5 letiSuffered a problem from year ... finally, over a long "disable and try" process, i've found that the problem was this addon ... with this addon installed i'm unable to have the login page in this site (https://manage.opensrs.com) so i think that many other site can have the same problem
========== added after dev answer ==========
ok, thank for your answer and your effort trying to solve the problem ... i've modified my review giving you 3 star instead of 1 starOdgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 5 letiThat page *really* does not like to have an iframe in it. I do not think there is any way to fix this other than disabling LSR (for that site). I have amended https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/7 to mention also this type of issue(s).
(As a side note, that page takes forever to load even when it works without any addons enabled, hurrah for the modern web I guess...) - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— ergonomic-cat, pred 5 leti
- Ocenjeno z 1 od 5— Peter Lyons Kehl, pred 5 letiWhen I restart Firefox (77.0.1) and I switch to any tab for the first time in the new FF session, the page loads partially up. Then it flickers/blinks before showing up fully.
Loading of tabs works correctly without Link Status Redux (with all other extensions/settings the same). So the problem is caused by Link Status Redux.Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 5 letiCannot reproduce, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/25 for details. - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 12564382, pred 5 letiI've only used this for 30 seconds, but I think it should be stock. I will update my review if my opinion majorly changes.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14064657, pred 5 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— LostPacket, pred 6 letiThank you for a nice extension.
2019-09-07 OP (now obsolete): I am seeing one (old) bug though: placement next to mouse cursor works correctly only at 100% zoom level. At other zoom levels, the popup gets proportionally misplaced (position seems to be relative to top/left corner of the page).
2019-11-08 Edit: Fix in 3.11 confirmed, thank you (rating adjusted accordingly).Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 6 letiThe bug seems to be difficult/impossible to fix, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/23 for details. Edit: fixed in version 3.11. - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14535628, pred 6 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 15167684, pred 6 letiAwesome extension! It's working on 68.0.1. I particularly liked the documentation, I've opted to replace the native status panel by disabling it via userChrome.css. This and "Dark Scroll" extension are a must have for cleaning up Firefox UI.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 15104231, pred 6 letiLightweight and dead simple. This thing is great. Unbelievable that Mozilla doesn't include it in Firefox. STILL works as of Firefox 67 (in July of 2019). Nice.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14644405, pred 6 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— dj, pred 7 leti
- Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— ray_bk, pred 7 letiI am using this addon v3.5 on Firefox v62 under Windows 7. This addon is great!
I have setting, "Above browser's native overlink panel (with no URL shown by default)", Offset from bottom: 16.
When I visit a page with maximized Firefox window and hover my mouse over a link, this addon perfectly displays last visited date just above the link text in the native overlink panel.
However, if I set Firefox window to normal state and resize it with smaller window width, a horizontal scroll bar appears in Firefox window. At this moment, if I hover the link in the page, the last visited date is not perfectly located just above the link text in the native overlink panel. There is a gap between them. So, the position is affected by the horizontal scroll bar.Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiI made an issue on github about this gap, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/issues/13 for details. Edit: fixed in version 3.6. Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiWell, that is unfortunate, but without any details all I can do is offer generic debugging advice: make sure you have the latest version of LSR, try with a clean profile and default settings without any other add-ons installed. Also note that with default settings LSR does not display anything if the link is not visited.- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 5509417, pred 7 letiFor the bookmark bar can not work in F61.0.2?
Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiNo. Unless you have knowledge to the contrary, the WebExtension API has not been amended to allow this. - Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— Sumer123, pred 7 letiThanks for the developer, works fine except on one site (http://www.infosva.org/index.php). If I disable the add on (version 3.4)the site works (no error 404). Tried with old version 3.0 and works fine.
Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiThis is the exact same problem that I run into a month or so ago on a different site. I developed the fix, but did not hurry with a new version as it was only that one site (for me).
This is fixed in version 3.5, see https://github.com/jaatroko/link-status-redux/commit/4ebda746fc85340790e2a7ed3fb19c3daaa9b51b if you want to know the details.