17 ocen
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Lampe2020, pred 10 meseciI don't know why this isn't core functionality in Firefox and why this extension isn't among Mozilla's "Recommended" either.
This extension is an immediate improvement, because I now have a much easier time understanding source files that I open in Firefox.
Some slight changes for this to be perfect would be to enable autodetect by default and to choose a more contrasty colour scheme by default (Qt Creator Light/Dark maybe) so the highlighted text doesn't fade into the background. - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— MP3Martin, pred enim letom
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Fabian B., pred 2 letoma
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Mohammad Banisaeid, pred 3 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— yazpower, pred 3 leti
- Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— Davide, pred 3 letiSo it only works for RAW files, not on the pages itself, is that correct?
Thank you :-)Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 3 letiYes, that's correct: raw files (with a few exceptions that won't work, those on raw.githubusercontent.com being a notable one).
We could technically inject the library code to colour elements on regular pages, but I wouldn't really know what to colour exactly, it depends too much on the page. Doing all `` blocks could be a thing maybe, or we could imagine adding a feature to selectively colour a block, but there's nothing of the sort supported by the add-on at the moment. - Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— OM_RA, pred 4 letiIt does the job, although I wish it could work in the source code of web pages.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Vedun, pred 4 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 16892439, pred 4 leti
- Ocenjeno z 3 od 5— weiss, pred 7 letiNot bad, but doesn't work on github RAW files, so it is pretty much useless for me :( Anyway, a custom scheme import functionality would be nice.
Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiThanks for the feedback, and sorry to hear that about the GitHub raw files :(. In case you haven't seen it already, there are explanations about it here [0].
For the color schemes, I'm relying on the schemes providing by highlight.js. I don't really have the motivation for adding an “import” feature (but would possibly accept a PR). I'll file an issue to acknowledge and keep track of the request, though.
[0] https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/8 - Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 14068156, pred 7 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— slazil, pred 7 letiOverall is excellent ext!
On note. Settings for autohilite and other one are not saved, so I must click 'autodetect' each time.Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 7 letiThanks for using the add-on, and for your feedback!
If the settings are not saved, this is a bug, I'll try to investigate. Any chance you can tell me about your OS and Firefox version, please? Here or on this GitHub issue: https://github.com/Qeole/Enlight/issues/9 - Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— enderandpeter, pred 8 letiI thought it was missing PHP, but it was just not in an obvious place. There's an initial list of what I guess are commonly requested languages and then suddenly it's an alphabetical list. Maybe the whole thing should be alphabetical for such a long list.
Odgovor razvijalca
objavljeno ob pred 8 letiThank you for the feedback!
The library that is used by the add-on makes a distinction between a set of “most-common languages”, and all other languages it supports. For technical reasons, this add-on initially supported just this restricted set of languages. When I added all the other ones (including PHP), I appended them to the list. So in fact this makes two alphabetical lists: a first one with the “most-common languages” (as presented by the library, I'm not actually trying to classify languages here), and a second one below, with all other languages.
I understand that this might be confusing. Maybe I will change it in the future. Ideally, I would like to implement an option to switch between the complete list of languages, or just the restricted subset. One advantage would be that auto-detection goes much faster when the library is compiled for fewer languages…
Anyway, thanks again! - Ocenjeno z 4 od 5— Ludwig, pred 8 letiWorks. However, the settings could be better. It's hard to find a good, bright color scheme without a quick preview.
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 13189945, pred 8 leti
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— Uporabnik Firefoxa 12504175, pred 8 letiThanks for the update to the new framework!
- Ocenjeno z 5 od 5— jalcine, pred 8 leti