Análises para Better Image Viewer
Better Image Viewer por Geoff Lankow
71 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 16155664 , há 5 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por McBaldwins , há 6 anosExactly what I've been looking for all these years! Thanks!
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13071474 , há 6 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Radu Bogoevici , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13875734 , há 7 anosIt actually works! thanks you so much!
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por ElibenYaacov , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 13601084 , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Utilizador do Firefox 14609537 , há 7 anos
- FINALLY able to drag / pan on a browser! I tried Chrome exts & Opera exts and got nowhere! Drives me nuts that you zoom into a image and yet can't pan around. Thank You for making live easier. Unlike another browser that thinks you should concede to their demands.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Kuba Niewiarowski , há 7 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Jacques shellac , há 7 anosEverything works as expected, exactly what you'd expect firefox to do by default.
- I love the zooming and panning, wish for rotation as others have mentioned.
I guess I found a bug:
When an image is loaded with an EXIF orientation that requires rotation, the image is rotated but the dimensions are not swapped. So you wind up with, e.g., a 480x640 portrait picture, stretched and squished to fit in a 640x480 area.
Edit: I skimmed the code and I'm not sure this extension is entirely at fault. Increasing my rating.
To the author, I'd have a look at whether naturalWidth and naturalHeight are read before exif orientation is used, and if anything can be done.
Edit again: maybe this only affects photos taken on an iPhone? I don't have enough examples to be sure.