Análises de WOT - Navegação segura
WOT - Navegação segura por WOT Services
589 análises
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 4 mesesWe’re sad to hear about your experience with WOT. We would love to hear more of your feedback - contact us to schedule a call and get a surprise as a token of our appreciation.Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 4 mesesThank you, for your thoughtful feedback! We're delighted that you appreciate our app. Should you have any suggestions, feel free to reach out at support@mywot.com- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Carter-M, há 4 mesesThis extension has been exposed for selling user data. Also their website is crumbling to dust.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 4 mesesHey Carter, please contact us directly so we can look into it. - Avaliado em 4 de 5por User, há 5 mesesAs soon as there will be more transparent and honest alternative, people will stop using WOT, but for now they are essential service. They had a tradition of rarely selling ratings to scam sites and selling personal data, but still to check balance of good deeds vs harm they are noticeably on good side. But only until transparent alternative emerges (or they dramatically improve transparency and trustworthiness and protection against fake ratings of any kind).
And for sure have a compassion - area they work is extremly hard and full of people who want to exploit. Even Google is failing lately in a holy battle against spam.
And fix my badge please, just got 1500+ points, and still no recognition! Outrageous! :)Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 4 mesesHi there, if you are enjoying WOT, please give it a 5-star rating to support our efforts 🙂 - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Lover, há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por dE_logics, há 5 mesesThis steals and sells your data
https://thehackernews.com/2016/11/web-of-trust-addon.htmlResposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 4 mesesHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13507298 do Firefox, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Mikis, há 6 meses
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 5 mesesHey Rambo Woo, we are glad you are trying out our app :)- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Alex, há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por zluka505, há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por MaSHiNiK, há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por James Barcus, há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Laconia, há 9 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13361995 do Firefox, há 9 mesesЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por kriztmark hacking session, há 10 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 18068857 do Firefox, há 10 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 18040293 do Firefox, há um anoA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Coiialj, há um ano
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Philip Goddard, há um ano(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame! - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18002481 do Firefox, há um ano
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 18002124 do Firefox, há um anorecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Avaliado em 1 de 5por Matthew Conrad, há um anoUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há um anoHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Avaliado em 1 de 5por pelle, há um ano