Análises de Cookie Quick Manager
Cookie Quick Manager por Ysard
Análise de Usuário 14072894 do Firefox
Avaliado em 4 de 5
por Usuário 14072894 do Firefox, há 7 anosWhy it should have permission to modify privacy settings now?! What's required by specific features could be given by telling user what should be, and how to be edited, or at least provide an option to let extension asking users who needs these features to allow these permission.
--------
Edit 1: Thanks for your patiently reply. Despite that the permissions are required, this extension's context support helped me in time to perfectly experience FF Context feature.
As for granting permission, there's a extension called "SiteDelta Highlight" on AMO you could refer to. Click into its settings page, which displays prompt "Advanced features (that require additional permissions) are disabled." with a button "Enable advanced features...".
Then click on that button, Firefox will prompt it requires additional permissions. So I think it should be able to grant several parts of permissions separately.
And a few advice:
1. Add context to directly "move to container" rather than only "copy to"
2. Ability to select multiple domain / multiple cookies at the same time
3. Every button in the bottom has hang-over tool-tips except the first one from left (and the forth, well it's easy to guess it is for donating). So... the first button with a trash bin icon is so disturbing I don't know what scope it applies to, neither know if it will ask me to sure before doing something.
4. Right-click context menu is not fully visible when click on item close to window border.
5. Why I couldn't copy expired cookies to other container? if it's exist when I access its website it would seem to be refreshed, so it maybe useful, why can't move it?
--------
Edit 1: Thanks for your patiently reply. Despite that the permissions are required, this extension's context support helped me in time to perfectly experience FF Context feature.
As for granting permission, there's a extension called "SiteDelta Highlight" on AMO you could refer to. Click into its settings page, which displays prompt "Advanced features (that require additional permissions) are disabled." with a button "Enable advanced features...".
Then click on that button, Firefox will prompt it requires additional permissions. So I think it should be able to grant several parts of permissions separately.
And a few advice:
1. Add context to directly "move to container" rather than only "copy to"
2. Ability to select multiple domain / multiple cookies at the same time
3. Every button in the bottom has hang-over tool-tips except the first one from left (and the forth, well it's easy to guess it is for donating). So... the first button with a trash bin icon is so disturbing I don't know what scope it applies to, neither know if it will ask me to sure before doing something.
4. Right-click context menu is not fully visible when click on item close to window border.
5. Why I couldn't copy expired cookies to other container? if it's exist when I access its website it would seem to be refreshed, so it maybe useful, why can't move it?
Resposta do desenvolvedor
publicado há 7 anosHi, it's a good question; the need for access rights to the API "privacy" is already explained on the presentation page of the addon:
Access and modify various privacy-related browser settings (the FirstPartyIsolation flag here).
Detecting the status of the FirstPartyIsolation option is absolutely necessary from Firefox 58 for people who want to use this extra protection.
This is a nightly feature that is currently not available other than through about:config for public versions of Firefox.
The API is here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/privacy/websites
The way Firefox handles permissions is all or nothing: all permissions are granted or none of them are.
To my knowledge I can not ask the user to selectively accept a permission and not another.
If you have an example of this type of form, please create an issue on the GitHub so that I can explore that.
In any case if the access to the privacy API is refused, the addon will not be able to manage the cookies created with the option FirstPartyIsolation activated, even if this one is deactivated later.
Regards.
Access and modify various privacy-related browser settings (the FirstPartyIsolation flag here).
Detecting the status of the FirstPartyIsolation option is absolutely necessary from Firefox 58 for people who want to use this extra protection.
This is a nightly feature that is currently not available other than through about:config for public versions of Firefox.
The API is here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/privacy/websites
The way Firefox handles permissions is all or nothing: all permissions are granted or none of them are.
To my knowledge I can not ask the user to selectively accept a permission and not another.
If you have an example of this type of form, please create an issue on the GitHub so that I can explore that.
In any case if the access to the privacy API is refused, the addon will not be able to manage the cookies created with the option FirstPartyIsolation activated, even if this one is deactivated later.
Regards.
381 análises
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por t3 ur u4 to c3, há 14 diaspretty good but there should be an option to restore recently deleted cookies. my colour scheme got weird for even basic searches after removing all my cookies (i didn't know at the time that some cookies can be useful)
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por たやまみ, há 25 dias
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Tofuwuerfel, há 2 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 19114790 do Firefox, há 3 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Gordon Freeman, há 5 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por FTMLIFESTYLE, há 6 meses
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Simon Morgan, há 7 mesesTerrible UI. The delete button looks like it deletes the current cookie(s), but actually deletes all of them.
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Jackie Daytona, há 8 meses
- Avaliado em 2 de 5por molitar, há 9 mesesWas unable to capture the entire cookie so was useless to me I needed the entire cf_clearance=
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 18767193 do Firefox, há 10 meses
