Análises de Smart HTTPS
Smart HTTPS por ilGur
Análise de Saverdun
Like a rollin' stone.
1- 'Smart HTTPS (revived)' is definitely faster than its non-WebExtension ancestor. It runs flawlessly here, first site analysis (when a site appears to not support https) appears to perform even faster than before and I've never encountered the 3 seconds default maximum delay before switching to http when applicable : it's very quickly understood by the add-on.
2- Time is on the side of 'Smart HTTPS' (revived or not but time will remain on its revived side) because more and more sites are shifting to https, this is notorious.
Hence, I've abandoned a well-known HTTPS approach, that of a listing, in favor of this approach (do it securely, return to non-secure if applicable and write it down to avoid further https quest) which seems more and more pertinent with... time.
1- 'Smart HTTPS (revived)' is definitely faster than its non-WebExtension ancestor. It runs flawlessly here, first site analysis (when a site appears to not support https) appears to perform even faster than before and I've never encountered the 3 seconds default maximum delay before switching to http when applicable : it's very quickly understood by the add-on.
2- Time is on the side of 'Smart HTTPS' (revived or not but time will remain on its revived side) because more and more sites are shifting to https, this is notorious.
Hence, I've abandoned a well-known HTTPS approach, that of a listing, in favor of this approach (do it securely, return to non-secure if applicable and write it down to avoid further https quest) which seems more and more pertinent with... time.
258 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 14430802 do Firefox, há 7 meses
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por wavingdragon, há 2 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por IVAN DAVID MARIN MENDOZA, há 3 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 17499918 do Firefox, há 3 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por MayinEllen, há 4 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Salman Hameed, há 4 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Bill Mayhew, há 4 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 15434003 do Firefox, há 4 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Julio Varella, há 4 anos