New Tab Override에 대한 리뷰
New Tab Override 제작자: Sören Hentzschel
리뷰 32개
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14781693 님, 7달 전Adds automatically "http://" to the URL which prevent from using values like "about:home".
개발자 답글
7달 전에 게시됨This doesn't make sense since "about:home" is the default new tab page and you woulnd't use this add-on at all to use it as new tab page.
Also it's not possible at all for WebExtensions to open about:home via the tabs API. - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 17181494 님, 2년 전🤯🤯🤯 Cannot just simply OPEN NEW TAB since now. WTF?
Without disturbing my brain with opening setup page instead again and again.
But why? Why?!
I need to have ability to open NOT only http or https as a new tab! What about "about:blank" AT LEAST? 🤨 - 5점 만점에 2점miranda_escobedo 님, 2년 전Don't know what is suddenly going wrong but this is taking forever to load
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 13858042 님, 2년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점dmaegerli 님, 2년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 17193432 님, 2년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 12795816 님, 3년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 15719379 님, 3년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14696322 님, 3년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점zender42 님, 3년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 16505220 님, 3년 전Currently not really useful due to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409675
- 5점 만점에 2점Alex Mirnov 님, 4년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Jed Moody 님, 4년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점miwoj 님, 4년 전after opening new tab it takes 1-2 seconds for New Tab Override to load before it can be used.
too long for me, it breaks my flow. when i open new tab i want to start typing my search right away (same as in default empty new firefox tab). - 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14198562 님, 5년 전What's the point if the url bar is already filled and each time I have to clear it first to browse
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 15064307 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Dick 님, 5년 전I'm sure this works great for what it was designed for. However, I build my own Home Page using images on my harddrive as my link, not text. Because New Tab Override cannot load local images it's pointless.
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 12851851 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 12505630 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14358423 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14450860 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14442851 님, 5년 전
- 5점 만점에 2점Firefox 사용자 14320088 님, 6년 전Will not allow loading local files on Ubuntu / Linux.
No, "Mozilla doesn't allow this functionality" is not an answer. I have a different extension, with the same local file, working perfectly fine on Windows 8.1 but it refuses to load on Ubuntu. This extension doesn't even make an attempt to load the file. It's HTML, CSS, JS so the semi support doesn't work (and isn't a real fix because I want changes to be made immediate which is why it's a local file in the first place). The only use I have for this extension does not work so it is immediately uninstalled.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edit: I don't think I can reply to developer comments so I will here instead.
Firstly, I don't need to make a GitHub issue because this isn't GitHub. This is the review section of mozilla.org where I review the extension I downloaded that doesn't do what I wanted it to. Secondly, I did say exactly what is wrong. If the path does not start with http:// or https:// the extension refuses to load without even trying. This is not a technical reason, this is a developmental choice and why the other extension loads on Windows (because it doesn't give up the moment I input my file path). Lastly, the other extension works on Windows 8.1 and 10 merely by inputting file:// (path to file) despite it too saying it's not supported. The steps to reproduce the two star review are: 1) choose new URL 2) input anything that's not http:// or https:// 3) immediately uninstall and leave a poor review reflecting this design choice.
Thank you for making the extension (I didn't rate it one star) but the extensions design choice makes it unusable for local file hosting which works despite it not being officially supported. All I need(ed) it to do was auto open an HTML file from my machine (not cache but actually open to access ./css, ./js, etc) but I have since worked around this issue.개발자 답글
6년 전에 게시됨And where is your GitHub issue where you are showing the other add-on and you local file? Sorry, it's not okay to give such reviews and telling the add-on does something wrong and not to say what exactly is wrong. And honestly, I can't believe that it works on Windows and not on Linux. So please provide the test case and steps to reproduce before giving bad reviews…