Recensioni per Block or Highlight Search Engine Results
Block or Highlight Search Engine Results di pistom
79 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 18779580, 4 mesi faBeen using it with DDG, and it's been life-changing. No more raking through SEO optimizers with useless articles that go on forever. Blocked, moved on. Now my research is free of the mental load of weeding out these websites. Recommend 11/10
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14108576, 6 mesi faWorks great for Google. But. The docs say it'll work for other search engines, but I can't figure out how to make it happen.
- Valutata 3 su 5di Tamm Horsfall, 8 mesi faGreat for studying purposes to filter out less credible sources and highlight those with constantly good information.
Edit: The limit for blocked/highlighted pages is super low. Please ten-fold it. - Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 18659682, 10 mesi faI was wary looking through the needed permissions for this extension so an independent review of how that data is used would be welcome but it does exactly what it says on the tin. I put in fandom.com and block in the settings and it blocked all fandom.com search results from showing up in DuckDuckGo just like it says it will.
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13243261, un anno fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Pyromania5, un anno fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di DreadBalaur, un anno faOnly hide web search results. No functionality for videos/images.
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 17332254, un anno faAs others have stated, does not work with Startpage. Not able to block out the massive Reddit, Amazon and MS links, to name a few, is quite the bummer!
- Valutata 5 su 5di Nikita, un anno fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Bill_H, un anno faIt's great, except it doesn't work for the new search-engines (e.g. Brave search) that do a much better job than Google, Bing, or DuckDuckGo.
- Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 16425262, un anno faThis isn't working for all supported search engines in Firefox. While it's working with DuckDuckGo, it's not with Startpage. Adding a domain to the list to be hidden does not affect the search result list. There's an old open PR and the last activity in the codebase was quite some time ago. This leads me to think the extension has been abandoned
- Valutata 5 su 5di Crispy, un anno faExcellent turfed microsoft from search results, never got any thing from MS VBA advice except frustration, Gbu all
- Valutata 1 su 5di Utente Firefox 18272145, 2 anni fa
- Valutata 2 su 5di Piecevcake, 2 anni faDidn't hide or transparent, but did highlight the 1st one, with part of the url specified.
rule for *.com did nothing
2nd try at highlighting didn't highlight.
Am I missing something? - Valutata 2 su 5di Utente Firefox 13524479, 2 anni faI moved away from "Seartch Filter" which sadly doesn't work to that. First test of "block or highlight" : I hide the domain "https://stability.ai/". I run a search to see what happens : it hid the domain, cool, but also tons of other pages such as this one: "https://www.instagram.com/stability.ai/" ... Why ??? Because... it has the words "Stability AI" in it ?
This add-on proposes to hide a DOMAIN NAME but instead it hides tons of (totally) unrelated domains.
Absolutely useless as it is.
Two stars because the different options for hidding / highlighting are definitely a great idea. Too bad it doesn't understand... what is a domain name 눈_눈 - Valutata 5 su 5di Thijs Putman, 2 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 14516243, 2 anni faI've been using this for several years with Google Search, and it was initially very effective in blocking unwanted results. For some time now, it has failed to block "sponsored" results, which may be a drawback it can't overcome--and so I've become accustomed to ignoring the top handful. Today I discovered a new wrinkle. Sadly, some sites have evidently strong-armed Google into ignoring my wish never to be reminded of them, specifically Amazon and Goodreads, an Amazon subsidiary. This add-on has therefore become much less useful to me. I would be happy to support it financially if it were more robust.
- Valutata 5 su 5di CyberCollector.A.M, 2 anni fa