Recension de Tar-Man
Classificate 3 de 5
per Tar-Man, pred 8 meseciAmazing in principle, and props for keeping Decentraleyes up-to-date. But in practice I kept having issues with exception fields not saving properly, sync not being reliable, and too much manual intervention required for sites that had issues. It's up to you if that's worth it to you. Very responsive dev. Wish I could rate higher.
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate pred 8 meseciThanks for your feedback. I've been testing Firefox Sync for the last few days and could not find any errors while it was running, but I could find a few issues right after browser start. Hopefully these changes will fix the problem: https://codeberg.org/nobody/LocalCDN/issues/1510
219 recensiones
- Classificate 5 de 5per Belladonna, pred 10 dnevigodsend, it really is different from decentraleyes and if you have both installed, you're pretty much just untouchable from all the garbage requests and cdn. Love this a lot.
- Classificate 5 de 5per Mohammad K., pred 12 dnevi
- Classificate 5 de 5per antistress, pred 18 dnevi
- Classificate 5 de 5per Firefox user 17888601, pred 25 dnevi
- Classificate 5 de 5per Michael, pred enim mesecem
- Classificate 5 de 5per Sam, pred enim mesecemThis has more features and has more CDN coverage than Decentraleyes. The extension feels a little heavy. Speed needs improvement, but otherwise it is very good.
- Classificate 3 de 5per HonestReviews, pred enim mesecem4-25-24: Takes 2-3 times longer than other extensions to load intobrowser. If this is any indication of it's ability to speed up your pages, it won't
- Classificate 5 de 5per geeknik, pred enim mesecem
- Classificate 5 de 5per brna71, pred 2 mesecema
- Classificate 5 de 5per mo, pred 3 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per Firefox user 18291635, pred 4 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per Henrique, pred 4 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per Lemonade, pred 4 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per Firefox user 17303262, pred 5 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per MaSHiNiK, pred 6 meseci
- Classificate 3 de 5per JJ, pred 6 meseciI'd rate as 5 stars if it's not due to its broken URL matching. e.g. I can't even visit the home page of any CDN server unless the whole CDN domain is excluded from LocalCDN or unless LocalCDN is disabled.
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate pred 6 meseciThanks for the feedback. The main task of LocalCDN is to redirect requests to CDNs to the internal storage or block them. Of course, this also includes the rare case when a user wants to visit a CDN's website directly. Normal users are not interested in CDNs or their websites, so advanced users should add CDN websites to the allowed list. - Classificate 5 de 5per Firefox user 13277273, pred 7 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per cheatfreak47, pred 7 meseciLocalCDN is a bit of a "tin-foil hat" style privacy tool if you ask me.
The prospect of relatively generic online resources hosted on content delivery networks being used to track you is definitely questionable, but on the other hand, reducing your networking footprint is still a generally good thing to do regardless- and LocalCDN seems to help with that goal, to some extent.
It seems to work, and it rarely causes trouble for sites most of the time, and it even supports whitelisting individual sites, so when it does break things, you can make it unbreak those things.
It's good but it's still up in the air how much this is actually contributing to your online privacy, if you ask me. - Classificate 5 de 5per MarsSeed, pred 7 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per days, pred 8 mesecigood thats its open source but even if i disable the extension for a website, the fonts are still not showing for some icons, e.g. arrow icons, when you have block google fonts on, disable, extension for website, refresh, it doesnt show fonts still, you have to remove cookies and site data, refresh, then it works
Responsa de disveloppator
publicate pred 7 meseciIt would be great if you can also give an example so I can fix the issue. - Classificate 5 de 5per Freso, pred 8 meseci
- Classificate 5 de 5per LookedSpy637, pred 9 meseci