Recenzije za Return YouTube Dislike
Return YouTube Dislike od Dmitry Selivanov
Recenzija od Myrhold
Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5
od Myrhold, prije 4 mjeseca4.736 recenzija
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od aUser, prije 3 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od petethecanuck, prije 3 danagreat add on but stopped working this morning. Thanks Google.
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Sweet Citrus, prije 3 dana[Editing my review]
The problem I mentioned prior is gone now. I can now rate this 5/5!! - Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 17708027, prije 6 danaПолезное расширение, однако в 2025-м году заметил, что оно начало сильно загружать CPU и дисковую подсистему. Процессор греется, системный блок шумит. Создается впечатление, что автор встроил в него майнер. Досадно! Теперь прийдется постоянно включать-выключать это расширение чтобы увидеть оценки. Firefox v.115.27.0esr (64-разрядный)
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Zelgadis-San, prije 8 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Juraj Mäsiar, prije 11 danaThank you for bringing back what never should have been removed :)
- Ocijenjeno s 3 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 13519206, prije 13 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18900251, prije 13 danaThe Dev tried to push a little e-beg window into his app which caused a lot of negative reviews. The Dev lost their mind and started replying and arguing with EVERYONE in the comments who was upset with the change and left a comment about his extension.
The Dev messed up big time in how he implemented this ad and how he is responding to the negative feedback. I removed the extension because the Dev appears to be really unstable and not untrustworthy. He even responded to this comment below blaming everyone else but himself. If he has this much of an ego I would be afraid of what he might do and don't want him to have access to anything on my machine.Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 13 danaI was arguing with people who can't read - like geniuses who decided that the extension is paid now. (i.e. missed the point that all the features that existed before - are still free, and only the new, advanced features are paid, and used to cover the cost of running a free service for 20 million users. - Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Riku70X, prije 16 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od malisipi, prije 17 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od placidtea, prije 18 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Spigot, prije 18 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Dale Cooper, prije 19 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18909402, prije 19 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Kiwi18, prije 20 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 15889624, prije 21 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Cameron Owens, prije 22 danaI know everyone's gotta eat and nothing is truly free, but the way the large advertisement is implemented is obnoxious at best. I'll be uninstalling for the time being.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 21 danaGoing to be less obnoxious on Firefox, thanks to chrome for beta testing. - Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od kuroten, prije 23 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Nicky McCurdy, prije 24 danaThis extension is trying to monetize showing one bit of useful information on the page with intrusive ads and a premium tier.
- Ocijenjeno s 5 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 18144459, prije 24 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 19547104, prije 24 dana
- Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od qawas, prije 25 danaStay away. Tries to scam you with a $5 / month premium subscription. Greedy.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 25 danaMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Ocijenjeno s 1 od 5od Korisnik Firefoxa 6120711, prije mjesecasking for premium for such a simple addon
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 25 danaMonetization is needed, among other things, to pay for operating the extension.
Only advanced new features are paid - what you had for free is still free, and will always be free
All other extensions\apps with dislikes are using my API - with the api dying due to lack of funds - all other apps will die as well.
Unfortunately the extension requires quite a large database (~15TB) serivng 20 million unique daily users (chrome is not the only platform) - and it costs money.
The idea behind paid features was also to cover the costs (since donations became smaller than the hosting costs). Without bothering free users too much. - Ocijenjeno s 2 od 5od Chantelle, prije mjesecThe iffy "Premium" ad this has on the Chrome version is incredibly off-putting. If that's the direction this add-on goes in aka locking key features behind a paywall - I'll remove this. I do get that an add-on like this can be pricey to maintain but this could have been handled better imo.
Odgovor programera
objavljeno prije 25 danaYeah, you are. Begging things other people built to be free.