needs 1 more thing Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

I think you should be able to change the defoult bangs. But this is still awesome

10+ Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

10+

Good stuff!! Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Keep it up fellas and gals!!!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.5.1). 

Not necessary anymore Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

DuckDuckGo has been integrated in the FireFox search preferences. Still 5 stars as the best search engine.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.5.1). 

Great Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Fenomenal!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.5.1). 

Fantastyczne Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Fantastyczne!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

nice Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles

the way duckduckgo was completely embedded into the browser is really good.
But i feel people prefer directly opening a fresh page to do all that stuff.'coz its not the complete version having its privacy settings.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Wonderful! Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Makes Firefox and DuckDuckGo much Better!

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Einfach super Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Super Addon

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

DuckDuckGo cant beat Google_ Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

i never saw such empty Search Engine.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

muy buena Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

muy buena

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Ignores DuckDuckGo site privacy settings Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

On the DuckDuckGo site you can select search preferences that get saved either 'in the cloud' (hate that over-used, much-hyped term for something that's been done/standard for decades, whats wrong with 'online' or 'on DuckDuckGo's servers?) or locally via cookies. In those settings I can configure things like to use POST rather than GET, safe search on/off, sending referrers, regional settings and so on.

However this plugin seems to totally ignore those settings, and offers no way to configure those settings within the plugin itself.

A plugin to use a search engine provided by that search engine vendor should honour the configuration that can be provided at the site itself and/or include the same options within the plugin.

Is it deliberate that the additional privacy options available when using the site directly are not available when using this plugin? I don't see how a privacy aware organisation like DuckDuckGo, who build their reputation on privacy, could have accidentally not included those privacy configurations in their plugin.

As the plugin defeats a lot of the purpose of using DuckDuckGo, in fact BYPASSES that purpose, I am 1-starring it.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Thanks for your comment and concern about the privacy settings. The plugin works primarily by making DuckDuckGo the default search engine as well as adding a couple of other features. By design, the plugin settings do not affect your personal DuckDuckGo settings. In other words if you have set a particular region as default in the web UI then the plugin will continue to use that region. The only exception to this is POST and GET requests due to technical limitations. I believe this is the issue you're referring to and indeed, we should have made it clearer. I've now added it to the plugin's description.

Thank you again for the feedback. If you still feel this plugin affects the privacy DuckDuckGo provides, please send an example to the issues page on GitHub and we'll try to address it: https://github.com/duckduckgo/firefox-zeroclickinfo/issues

AddonTester Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

DuckDuckGo Plus is made Super. But again 5 points.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

It feels good to search the internet with a service that isn't spying on me.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Please provide full compatibility for Pale Moon browser instead of requiring PM users to use an old version of this extension.

Also, is it possible to support DDG settings via the toolbar so users don't have to keep a settings cookie?

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Smart, well done & one suggestion Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Runs flawlessly, even more pertinent when urlbar and searchbar are combined (i.e. with the Foobar add-on).
The !bang concept is absolutely terrific (mentioned even if it's not reserved to the add-on but a DuckDuckGo specificity).

One suggestion, that to add a 'Search Site' in the drop-down menu together with 'I'm feeling lucky" and other pre-installed shortcuts. I've had to find a 'Search Site with Google' bookmarklet, modify it to use DuckDuckGo (not a big job) and make a toolbar button that I place right after the 'DuckDuckGo Plus' toolbar icon... waste of space... and the 'Search Site' feature is so handy!

I've rounded my 4.9 rating to 5 :)

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

DuckDuckGO noch nicht wirklich für Deutschland Noté 4 sur 5 étoiles

Zu meinem Bedauern sind die Ergebnisse für "kleine" Suchanfragen wie zB. "Traumdeutung" noch nicht besonders gut. Aber ich hoffe das hier der Index noch aufholt.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

O único problema é que é uma m**da. / The only problem is that sucks Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

É lindo (e necessário) cuidar da privacidade, mas um mecanismo de busca tem que ser bom em encontrar o que procuramos. Não é o caso.

Buscando "tribunal de contas do estado de santa catarina", por exemplo (perceba o nome completo e preposicionado, o google não precisa de metade) você não consegue na primeira página de resultados o site oficial - é uma vergonha!

Eu, como alguém que se preocupa com o problema oculto do mercado de dados, volta e meia tento usar o duckduckgo, e sempre me arrependo. Não chega aos pés dos fungos que atacam as bactérias dos pés do Google.
---
It's beautiful (and necessary) to take care of privacy, but a search engine has to be good at finding what we seek. Not the case.

Seeking "tribunal de contas do estado de santa catarina" [state audit office from a braSilian state], by example (regard the full name, google does not need half) you can not get on the first page of results the official website - is a shame!

I, as someone who cares about the hidden problem of data market, now and then I try to use DuckDuckGo, and always regret. Does not reach the foot of the fungi that attack bacteria of Google feet.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Can you please try your query again with the region being set to Brazil?

If the official website is (http://www.tce.sc.gov.br/) then in our tests it showed as the first result.

Wholesome duckness for all the family Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Ducktastic, I like the way the results are presented, its also very quick, the only thing I miss is the image tab. Find a way to add an image tab peoples.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed). 

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Chévere, me encanta porque se puede personalizar y guardar estas config en la nube. Además no está tan mal el uso de ¡Bang para personalzar las búsquedas.

Cette critique est pour une version précédente du module (0.4.6.1-signed).