Critiques pour 404 Bookmarks
404 Bookmarks par Tom Schuster
106 notes
- Noté 4 sur 5par nd4spd, il y a 7 ansHow about listing the number of 'expired' bookmarks too?
Ability to filter certain kinds of errors?
Button to 'remove all' expired bookmarks (with a warning dialog of-course)?
Thanks for the addon! - Noté 5 sur 5par P M Donovan, il y a 7 ansI've used a couple of other dead bookmark finders and 404 has found ones that the others did not.
I do have to note that I've been on the I'net for 20+ years and have migrated my book marks from Prodigy to Netscape to FF.
404 is the best dead bookmark finder I've used. Yes, it is not perfect. But then, who or what is. - Noté 2 sur 5par Paul Heil, il y a 7 ansImplementation in a panel is not a great idea since it re-checks all bookmarks each time you open it and the results don't cache. The list keeps scrolling to the top as it returns results so you have to wait until it's all done... and forget about viewing another website while it works since you have to start over if you leave the panel.
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansI just updated the add-on the version 1.1, which moves from the panel to a normal webpage. You still don't get caching after you close the tab, but I don't think that would be really useful. - Noté 2 sur 5par swingwolf, il y a 7 ansCette extension aurait pû remplacer AM-Deadlink avantageusement. Je l'ai installé sur Cyberfox 64 bits dernière version. Au premier clic sur l'icône dans la barre, 404 Book m'a listé un paquet de liens morts sur les 4000 que je dois avoir avec une étiquette "remove" à droite pour chacun des liens morts puis Cyberfox a planté puis si je clique à nouveau je n'ai plus rien à part Cyberfox qui "gèle" plus ou moins. Cette extension est très instable et pas finalisée. Je conserve pour l'instant en évitant son utilisation.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12815003 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansI love what this add-on tries to do but the implementation is very poor. The list of bad bookmarks often disappears for no apparent reason. Plus, there's no way to copy the questionable link (using Cntl-C) so that you can check the site in another tab or browser. If these two things were fixed then the add-on would be way more useful and usable.