Bewertungen für Web Scraper
Web Scraper von webscraper.io
9 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18151135, vor 16 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 13976503, vor 4 MonatenThis is about the worst usage documentation for an extension I've seen since 1998. All I wanted to do was basically create a site map of a non-ecomm website. This is a perfect example of people who know their app inside and out, not looking at it from the viewpoint of the user. When certain elements don't show up the same in a user's situation as they do in a no-sound video, it's confusing and incomplete help. I'd give it a zero stars if I could because it's worthless without a more clear training. Over-simplification is not always good.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon David Saylor, vor 8 Monaten
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon udit, vor einem Jahrexport option not working
to developer - it is working but erratically , sometimes exporting quickly sometimes exporting after hours. sometimes not at all no matter how many times i press the export button.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem JahrI just did a test. It is working. Please provide more detailed description with steps to reproduce the problem on https://forum.webscraper.io/ - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon jim, vor einem Jahruseless. Lies on the website. Said you can use this standalone. Its only usable in their paid service.. which I wont pay for as I cant test it. Usless.
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon IBAH, vor 2 JahrenParser is paywalled.
So this plugin is for simple tasks only.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 2 JahrenYes the parser is only available in Web Scraper Cloud. But you can use OpenRefine to parse scraped data. It is a free tool for large dataset parsing.
We have written a series of articles on how to use OpenRefine:
https://webscraper.io/blog/data-transformation-with-Open-Refine - Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon user567898756, vor 3 Jahren
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon JagWife06, vor 6 JahrenIt definitely pulls the html data as needed, but it returns multiple selectors scrambled and not in order. For example, I'm pulling news articles from a search on a newspaper's website. I had selectors for the date published, article title, url to the article, and the little snippet/article preview. It returned ALL of the data requested, but none of the selectors are on one line together in the CSV file, so I can't tell what dates go with what urls/article titles, and what snippets belong to what article url/title.