Um diese Add-ons zu verwenden, müssen Sie
Firefox herunterladen

Registrieren oder Anmelden
Add-on-Symbol

Bewertungen für Exif Viewer

Exif Viewer von Alan Raskin

3,3 von 5 Sternen
5
22
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
15
22 Bewertungen
  • von Недвижимость в Испании у моря 🇪🇸☀️🌊, vor einem Monat
    Супер приложение! Спасибо!
  • von kaengu, vor 6 Monaten
    Easy to use and extremely useful - thanks for providing this!
  • von Little frog, vor einem Jahr
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 15217214, vor 2 Jahren
  • von AX11, vor 2 Jahren
    Does exactly what is says. Works pretty well, instantly gives detailed info about image metadata.
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14947076, vor 2 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14897228, vor 2 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14694902, vor 2 Jahren
    This plug in was very, very good until Firefox killed its usefulness to any file on the local hard drive, such as image files received or sent via email, those downloaded from a thumb drive, or those taken and saved on a local hard drive by the computer owner. Firefox in some sort of misguided, perhaps just thoughtless, security move destroyed the ability to use Firefox in a fully functional way as photographers had done previously for many, many years. Too bad for us photographers. But, who cares about us, eh? So, now off to investigate using some other browser that actually might be fully functional for looking at photographs, including my own.
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14685272, vor 2 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14652109, vor 2 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14565026, vor 2 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14558350, vor 3 Jahren
    Cool
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14103221, vor 3 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14089545, vor 3 Jahren
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 14035284, vor 3 Jahren
    Para ver EXIF de las imágenes, autor, datos de cámara, parámetros de la fotografía... EL MEJOR!!!
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 13744732, vor 4 Jahren
  • von kelendral, vor 4 Jahren
    Working great on Basilisk 2018.01.05
  • von DeronLJ, vor 4 Jahren
    Very handy add-on to display a huge amount of detail about an image.
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 13346095, vor 4 Jahren
    A nice and useful module. Thanks!

    However, it would be even better if we could select what type of visualization we want, instead of having to go in a sub-menu to pick one among four presentations (table, basic, etc.). A settings option would be a welcome.

    Moreover, it would be faster to parse visually if we could select which attributes to display or hide.

    As a bonus, a possibility to override the default CSS would be nice (I'm thinking about lowering the contrast and size of attribute codes), but maybe overkill too! :)
  • von algi, vor 4 Jahren
    Working well in FF56 64bit.
    Thank you.
  • von Firefox-Benutzer 13327053, vor 4 Jahren
    New version (3.0) cannot be installed, FF says it's corrupt... Please, fix it.
    Thanks.

    EDIT: Thanks, but it didn't help, my FF ESR 52.4.0 (32-bit) still says it's corrupt. I fixed it by modifying manifest.json (un-commenting "applications" section and changed min version to 52...) Maybe you could make it compatible to ESR too...

    Antwort des Entwicklers

    geschrieben am vor 4 Jahren
    I just removed and re-installed it on my system, and it worked fine. A couple of other users were also able to install it without any problems. You might want to try removing it, exiting from Firefox, and then re-installing it from addons.mozilla.org; perhaps the download failed.
  • von andrew, vor 4 Jahren
    Thanks for the update!
    I have a problem - long time of loading result with large files.

    Antwort des Entwicklers

    geschrieben am vor 4 Jahren
    Yes.

    The "legacy" version could stream the image's binary data a little at a time, since it was able to use the XPCOM interface to access Firefox's functionality.

    The WebExtensions version is much more restricted, because it is treated much the same as any web page, and so it has to download the entire image before it can process it.

    Out of curiosity, what are your browser's cache settings? I'd hope that the Viewer's request for the image has access to the cache, but maybe not.

    - Alan