Bewertungen für Exif Viewer
Exif Viewer von Alan Raskin
43 Bewertungen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 12504516, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 1 von 5 SternenI just upgraded from pre-57 Firefox to 62, and installed the latest version of EXIF viewer, which I've been using for years. The user interface is not as good as the old version, but worst of all, it shows zero information about the image. Nothing at all. The old version showed full details of the same photo, but this new version shows nada. I've uninstalled and reinstalled, and rebooted, but nothing. It's a shame we can't use the old version anymore.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 3 JahrenCan you provide the URL of an image that is not being handled properly? The Viewer should still work, but there have been issues with local files in certain directories. - von Firefox-Benutzer 14257705, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13427448, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 1 von 5 SternenВ большинстве случаев работает некорректно .
- von Firefox-Benutzer 14103221, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 14089545, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 10821312, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen5/16/2020: Any word on Android? I know that "Search By Image" works on Android.
Works fine on Firefox for Desktop. Doesn't work *at all* for Firefox for Android.
Android works for https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/search_by_image/ . I don't understand why it doesn't work for EXIF!Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 3 JahrenFirefox for Android implements a very limited subset of the WebExtensions API. So, no context menus and no way to invoke the Viewer. Sorry, but until the Mozilla developers remove this limitation, the Viewer will be DOA on Android. - von Firefox-Benutzer 14035284, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenPara ver EXIF de las imágenes, autor, datos de cámara, parámetros de la fotografía... EL MEJOR!!!
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13980062, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13934159, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13744732, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternen
- von DeronLJ, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenVery handy add-on to display a huge amount of detail about an image.
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13460881, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternen
- von Firefox-Benutzer 13346095, vor 3 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenA nice and useful module. Thanks!
However, it would be even better if we could select what type of visualization we want, instead of having to go in a sub-menu to pick one among four presentations (table, basic, etc.). A settings option would be a welcome.
Moreover, it would be faster to parse visually if we could select which attributes to display or hide.
As a bonus, a possibility to override the default CSS would be nice (I'm thinking about lowering the contrast and size of attribute codes), but maybe overkill too! :) - von Firefox-Benutzer 13327053, vor 4 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenNew version (3.0) cannot be installed, FF says it's corrupt... Please, fix it.
Thanks.
EDIT: Thanks, but it didn't help, my FF ESR 52.4.0 (32-bit) still says it's corrupt. I fixed it by modifying manifest.json (un-commenting "applications" section and changed min version to 52...) Maybe you could make it compatible to ESR too...Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 4 JahrenI just removed and re-installed it on my system, and it worked fine. A couple of other users were also able to install it without any problems. You might want to try removing it, exiting from Firefox, and then re-installing it from addons.mozilla.org; perhaps the download failed. - von andrew, vor 4 JahrenBewertet mit 5 von 5 SternenThanks for the update!
I have a problem - long time of loading result with large files.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 4 JahrenYes.
The "legacy" version could stream the image's binary data a little at a time, since it was able to use the XPCOM interface to access Firefox's functionality.
The WebExtensions version is much more restricted, because it is treated much the same as any web page, and so it has to download the entire image before it can process it.
Out of curiosity, what are your browser's cache settings? I'd hope that the Viewer's request for the image has access to the cache, but maybe not.
- Alan