FoxFilter 的評論
FoxFilter 作者: Inspired Effect
Inspired Effect 的回應
開發者回應
張貼於 3 年前Hi, we offer all of the filtering options free of charge as a way to try out FoxFilter. In order help cover our expenses, we do charge a very minimal annual fee of $12.99, which we feel is very affordable. We are equally frustrated about Google Android only selectively supporting approximately 200 Chrome extensions for some reason, even though all Chrome extensions were installable on Android at one point. Feel free to reach out to us at foxfilter@inspiredeffect.com to discuss this more. Best regards, FoxFilter Team
80 筆評論
- Hello, I'm currently testing parental control systems to see which adult content tagging systems they respect. Even with "Examine Meta Content" turned on in the sensitivity settings, this extension fails to block websites based on various meta tags used by adult websites to identify themselves as such.
I've tested the following meta tags in use by adult websites and none of them cause the page to be blocked:
<meta name="rating" content="adult" />
<meta name="rating" content="mature" />
<meta name="RATING" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
<meta name="rating" content="RTA-5042-1996-1400-1577-RTA" />
This let me access at least two websites and various twitter accounts with explicit pornographic content which would otherwise have been blocked.
Also, all adult sites I've checked so far include at least one of these tags. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18974369,4 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18940725,4 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18639388,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Tushar Sharma,1 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18512180,1 年前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18410251,1 年前A bloquer l'accès à des sites pour faire les devoirs de mes enfants. Demande de payer pour débloquer le site. Extension à fuir.
- 評價 3 分,滿分 5 分來自 Yoann Moreau,1 年前Not so smart.
- When opening links in a tab, the filter will block the current page instead of the new tab.
- Filtering is quite basic and will have many false positive and false negative.
- Access to extension settings is protected with a ugly workaround, not convenient at all, and not secured anyway. - 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16976370,2 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17517208,3 年前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17490130,3 年前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Mephistopheles,3 年前Works, but uses the shady practice of not being able to set a password unless you pay them, so even if it's there, anybody can just turn it off anyway
Edit: Even if you pay them, trying to install the android version says not intended for android,wtf??開發者回應
張貼於 3 年前Hi, we offer all of the filtering options free of charge as a way to try out FoxFilter. In order help cover our expenses, we do charge a very minimal annual fee of $12.99, which we feel is very affordable. We are equally frustrated about Google Android only selectively supporting approximately 200 Chrome extensions for some reason, even though all Chrome extensions were installable on Android at one point. Feel free to reach out to us at foxfilter@inspiredeffect.com to discuss this more. Best regards, FoxFilter Team