NoScript 安全套件 的评价
NoScript 安全套件 作者: Giorgio Maone
258 条评价
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13525411,5 年前评分 4 / 5Good add-on, a must have.
One star missing cause of the new context menu UI, the previous one was better.
I like this new settings depth. - 来自 Dan Theman,5 年前评分 4 / 5Thank you for your continued development efforts. I hope you can return NoScript to it's former glory, despite the massive changes forced upon us all by Mozilla. I do miss the old interface, especially the simple "Temporarily Allow All Scripts" button.
- 来自 Jackson Alley,5 年前评分 4 / 5Appreciate the work to update this for Quantum. Working well most of the time but seems to have issues with piecemeal enabled scripts for a site with inter-dependencies. ESPN is good example.
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13391222,5 年前评分 4 / 5
- 来自 Firefox 用户 12210558,5 年前评分 4 / 5I put 4 stars to encourage the developer, but I don't understand how it works. I can't find the options with the whitelist, the embeddings and the appearance. I don't even understand how to temporary allow some scripts in one click like before. I downgrade in Firefox 56 and I'll wait for a better version.
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13468636,5 年前评分 4 / 5It's not as good as the original YET, but at least he put something out there so we're not browsing totally naked.
Interface not as friendly, block scripts well, but hard to fine tune like before.
A good start.
So thanks Giorgio and please keep working on that better version we all really want. Don't make us wait too long. - 来自 Firefox 用户 13515663,5 年前评分 4 / 5Nice new interface but very confusing. You gonna get a lot of complains about it.
- 来自 Prateek Shukla,5 年前评分 4 / 5Thanks for bringing the temporary allow all & revoke options. Please continue going and make the WE version as good and power as the normal version.
One question - Clicking the default option show that scripts are marked for sites to load, only objects are unmarked. Is this an UI error? - 来自 Rykum,5 年前评分 4 / 5Updating my review, now it's works under private tab. UI still needs some work but now it is more clear.
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13512679,5 年前评分 4 / 5Thanks! Works for me so far. One thing I found a bit tricky is that if one allows a script from a non-https site but without also allowing non-https from the site by clicking on the padlock, then reloading will show the site as "Default", i.e. most of the time as blocked. So it seems as if the allowing of the site was not remembered by no script. I think it would be better to show the site as allowed as one has chosen before since the padlock will give you the further information that it does only allow non-https.
I have seen lots of people saying that no script does not save allowed sites. So far for me the workaround was always to unlock the padlock as well. - 来自 GringoTM,5 年前评分 4 / 5Ottima Estensione fa quello che dice, purchè si capisca come lavora e la si configuri correttamente.
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13512395,5 年前评分 4 / 5Bisogna un po' abituarsi alla nuova interfaccia. Come al solito la pazienza degli utenti non e' un gran che "tutto e subito" imparate ad usarlo e controllate se funziona correttamente a me funziona egregiamente e mi sono gia abituato al nuovo look.
A una cosa dato che e' gratuito se non vi comoda cambiate pure componente aggiuntivo credo che Giorgio sopravvivera'.
TNX. - 来自 Firefox 用户 12674645,5 年前评分 4 / 5
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13508328,5 年前评分 4 / 5I am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - 来自 Reindl Harald,5 年前评分 4 / 5the android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13507805,5 年前评分 4 / 5The old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - 来自 Firefox 用户 13507030,5 年前评分 4 / 5Actually a 5*, it might be language related but in germany the translations are way to long for the new interface (Words don't fit in the reserved space).
Sadly it looks really bad.
For the other stuff I like the uMatrix like way to control what gets loaded.
Also, even thought I need to look how it works somewhere, that we got some https contol looks promising. - 来自 Firefox 用户 13505686,5 年前评分 4 / 5It's not as functional as the original, and it took a while to figure out how to temporarily allow a script. You have to click twice on the trusted icon. The bottom line is it still works.
- 来自 Firefox 用户 13505627,5 年前评分 4 / 51). As a regular NoScript user unfamiliar with code/script-related stuff, I must say this update is less UN-intuitive than the former and a bit more straightforward —still not a marvel in signage, indeed, but it never was, and seems it plays its role.
2). Mr. Maone is not obliged to respond to rude demands for his free, voluntary add-on. Those childish users calling us "bootlickers" hopefully will go away after another "better" (if possible) add-on, or even better, come with an improved one themselves. - 来自 Firefox 用户 13505104,5 年前评分 4 / 5I'm really glad NoScript made it to Quantum so quickly and the people who complain about missing features probably don't realize that this is a complete rewrite of an extension that has had the chance to mature for many, many years. Comparing the two is completely unfair and I really appreciate the many, many hours of spare time that has been put into this. I can see the UI could use some improvements, though. I would be very happy to lend you a hand with that if you want/need it (I work as a lead front-end developer), so let me know if you would like to take me up on that offer.
- 来自 Jeff,5 年前评分 4 / 5The previous version was perfectly fine........... Now you broke it with your latest update. No temporary permissions like the previous version.... Disabled until you fix it.
Update: I did not know that Firefox made a update causing Noscript to not work causing the dev to make a quick patch which lacked a lot of things that we liked. I'm adding back some stars for effort to push out a add-on so quickly after an update. Refinements are needed as the current add-on does not work as before. But I'm still going to disable it for the time being as its too confusing to use. Will check back daily to see if a new update is available and then update it accordingly.
10.1.2 update: I take it back..... In a mere 4 days you managed to almost rewrite a new add-on with the same use as v5... Well done man... Well done. - 来自 Firefox 用户 12676215,5 年前评分 4 / 5
- 来自 Krzysztof113,5 年前评分 4 / 5Ok. Good enough.
Sites presentation is clearer and more readable now.
Missing the temporary options and allowing all.