Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 的评价
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 作者: LanguageTooler GmbH
willo 的评价
评分 2 / 5
来自 willo,4 个月前4,204 条评价
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18709693,19 小时前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 georg,3 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 OTTIMIC,3 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Izverybad,3 天前Très bon correcteur à la volée. Il propose parfois des modifications qui ne sont pas adéquates, mais on a aussi un cerveau pour ne pas en tenir compte.
- 评分 1 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18705595,3 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Digital TV Media,4 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 16283084,4 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18703844,5 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Vasil,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Adrian,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 9989226,6 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 stefansoyka,8 天前Viel besser als alles, was ich vorher ausprobiert habe. Eine echte Hilfe, die auch Casus, Numerus und Genus von abhängigen Worten prüft. Ist auch in LibreOffice eine schöne Ergänzung, wenn man mal offline schreibt.
- 评分 2 / 5来自 Endless Fantasy,8 天前Two stars for not including an option to select, an “Any dialect” in the which dialect to use dropdown, or select multiple as a bubble, as either a basic or advanced option.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception. - 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18697898,8 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Владислав,8 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Heinz-Peter Katlewski,9 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Max Willer,10 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 cacti_009,11 天前
- 评分 4 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14487727,12 天前I have ProWritingAid Premium, which supposedly gives me the capabilities of this Add-on but I turned it off--will use it for large volume writing and editing--and bought the Pro version of LT instead for everyday use. It is really efficient on PC resources! That is a big deal for me. Apps that cause my PC to buffer or hang up kill my flow and productivity. I wished LT Pro had a writing level complexity rating, a la Hemingway Editor. The annual fee is not cheap either. My Lifetime PWA Premium license is a vastly superior deal. However, for efficient writing assistance and supervision, as you go, this is showing itself to be a standout tool.
- 评分 5 / 5来自 oenharth,12 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 14053445,13 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Weird0,13 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 TomPea MnS,13 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18687691,15 天前
- 评分 5 / 5来自 Firefox 用户 18663359,16 天前