Recensioner för WOT - Surfa säkert
WOT - Surfa säkert av WOT Services
Recension av Naitlydragon
Betygsatt 1 av 5
av Naitlydragon, för 2 år sedan557 recensioner
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av MaSHiNiK, för en dag sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av James Barcus, för 2 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Laconia, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 13361995, för 2 månader sedanЧто случилось с дополнением - оно жрёт память и проц как не в себя. Ну и плюс оценки на некоторых сайтах просто бесполезный кусок шлакоблоков. Раньше нравилось, а сейчас невозможно пользоваться - браузер еле ворочается с ним.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 17 dagar sedanHey, we are sorry to hear about your experience with WOT. Please contact us directly so we can assist you with any issue. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av kriztmark hacking session, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18068857, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18040293, för 3 månader sedanA long time ago was great. Now it puts shady ads on all the websites. Eff you, WOT. I would literally pay a subscription much faster than deal with ads.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 3 månader sedanHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Coiialj, för 4 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Philip Goddard, för 4 månader sedan(updated 6 September 2023) On the face of it, WOT is a great idea, but it wrongly gives some completely safe, authentic and trustworthy sites a poor safety rating -- two of my own sites suffering thus at the moment. For this sort of thing it's necessary for the site owner to be able to contact WOT admin directly, and not go through the cumbersome, lengthy, and indeed unreliable business of posting in the Forum to get members to review the affected site(s), or/and jump through other hoops -- but as far as I can make out, there are no such means.
Also, crowd-sourced ratings are worse than useless for giving a proper impression of validity, authenticity and overall quality of a site's contents, with regard to any subject matter about which most people hold beliefs -- such as religion, spirituality, New-Age and related areas, and indeed so-called 'mental health' (which is based in the materialistic reductionism belief system). In all such cases, the majority, belief-driven view takes priority over the more rational, objective (observation-based) view, and what the ratings are indicating is NOT any quality of the respective site contents, but simply their popularity -- which at best isn't particularly useful, and generally is seriously misleading.
One of my own sites is impacted thus, and it's galling to see so many belief-based sites (intrinsically misinformational because belief stands in the way of seeing what's really there) getting high ratings just because the respective beliefs are popular or traditional, while my own pioneering belief-free, objectively based site has only a so-so rating despite a string of very positive reviews from people who've genuinely benefited from that site.
Extrapolating from how my own sites are being treated by WOT, it's very reasonable always to be very circumspect about WOT ratings.
**Update, 6 August 2023**
I responded to the so-called Developer response to this review, with a detailed and constructive rundown on the various problems about WOT and asking for my wrongly 'usafe' and 'suspicious' rated sites to have their ratings corrected.
These people are mindbogglinly complacent and self-serving. All I got back was their standard BS line, with clear indications that this was just a pasted standard message, and one has to conclude that the contents of my message went unread.
I've therefore decreased my rating to one star.
I've tried to give WOT reasonable benefit of doubt, but they show themselves to be right out of touch with any sense of genuine human responsibility for what they're doing. Sure, it's a service, but the question is, who it's really serving. Not decent and conscientious websites and their owners, that's for sure! -- The WOT people should be hanging their heads in shame!Utvecklarens svar
postad för 3 månader sedanHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂 - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18002481, för 4 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 18002124, för 4 månader sedanrecently a few relible and well know websites got red and orange colour for no reason. Tried to contact WOT but got two times same copy / pasted response.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 4 månader sedanHey there, we would love it if you can share the names of the sites that we flagged, and we will carefully examen them..support@mywot.com - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Matthew Conrad, för 7 månader sedanUsed to be a good sites reputation extension. Now filled with ads and "premium" feature. Too bad! It used to be good and simple!
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 6 månader sedanHey, WOT is a freemium service and most of our features are offered for free. Our premium package offers advanced features such as Anti-phishing, Real-time protection and many more features to keep you protected online. We encourage you to contact us directly so we can assist in upgrading to the premium package 🙂 - Betygsatt 1 av 5av pelle, för 7 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av 天灭中共退党团队保平安, för 8 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17847732, för 8 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 17832293, för 9 månader sedanMillionen von Nutzerdaten verkauft. Ich wundere mich, wieso dieses Addon überhaupt noch auf dem Browser Addon Markt exestiert! Schmutz, einfach weg damit!
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 6 månader sedanHallo, bitte kontaktieren Sie uns direkt, damit wir uns das Problem ansehen können. - Betygsatt 3 av 5av user, för 9 månader sedanURL check is paid. Tracker blocking is paid.
They aren't clear about paid features beforehand. Their main website mywot.com is horrible with details now. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14954560, för 9 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av kaiete, för 9 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 13958735, för 10 månader sedanI have been using for years. I like having the sites rating provided for me. All the additional features are unnecessary for me given that I use other extensions. Recently I found this application was blocking sites I had otherwise whitelisted. I don't know how to easily resolve so uninstalling was quickest solution.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17763019, för 10 månader sedanУстановила расширение на ноутбук, работой довольна. Предупреждает об угрозах и безопасности сайтов. Программа ненавязчива, сообщает об угрозах в реальных случаях.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 15085278, för 10 månader sedan
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 9 månader sedanPlease give the app a 5-star rating so we can continue improving it 🙂- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 17735706, för ett år sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 14306928, för ett år sedanConsidering WOT has been caught many times hoarding our information and their govt being able to exercise control over it if they choose to, coupled with, false rating of some sites, such as some bad sites getting a green light and some good sites getting a red light... and I have reported both cases many months ago to WOT without them taking any action... and also considering that they're not endorsed by Mozilla, I don't trust this add-on and have uninstalled it from my FireFox.
Utvecklarens svar
postad för 9 månader sedanHey there, we'd be glad if you contacted us directly and shared your feedback with us so we can hear how the app can be improved for you 🙂